几何尺寸与公差论坛

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 845|回复: 0

【转帖】vertical feature control frame

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-5-4 11:09:33 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
vertical feature control frame
to the best of my knowledge, asme y14.5m-1994 does not explicitly say the gdt feature control frame must be horizontal, but i'm assuming it does.  a coworker asked me if i thought a vertical box is allowed, and i'm not 100% certain the control frame has to be horizontal.  any thoughts??
john graham cswp
mechanical design engineer
eng-tips forums is member supported.
asme y14.5m-1994 1.7.5 addresses this, more or less.  notes & dimensions should be placed to read from the bottom of the draing.  exception is baseline dims which may be read from right also.
so while it doesn't explicitly state fcf i would say that fcf are a form of dimensioning so should be read from the bottom.
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
  as kenat posts, all dimensional text (except baseline) is read from the bottom per y14.5.  i would consider gd&t to be dimensional text.
  just reading that doesn't really make sense to me.  after all, vertical text (baseline dim.s) can be read from the bottom up.  they clear that up with the examples shown.  it would be easier to understand if they specified left-to-right, but maybe i'm missing something here.
believe it if you need it or leave it if you dare.fff"> - robert hunter

i think they're specifying the orientation of the drawing.  so with the bottom of the drawing to the reader the text should be read normally.
make sense?
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
yeah, but i still like my way better.
believe it if you need it or leave it if you dare.fff"> - robert hunter

who doesn't
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
one of the reasons we use iso drawing standards, gtols can be horizontal or vertical.  it makes a vastly better looking drawing.
"it makes a vastly better looking drawing."
i guess it really boils down to what you are used to seeing.
believe it if you need it or leave it if you dare.fff"> - robert hunter

dgallup, personally i'd say most iso drawings i've seen don't look as nice as most asme drawings i've seen, and i've worked both systems.
that said sometimes having to put everything horizontal can be a pain.
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
geotols are hard enough to understand them when horizontal!
imho, the horizontal rule is more important nowadays than even back in the pre-cad era.  reason is that all documents are natually viewed flat to the screen where the top of the document is the top of the screen.  i disagree with using vertical text on documents these days because it requires the average person to tilt their head or find some way to rotate the document (which is different in each program, and even from version to version of a program...not to mention the fact that many programs think the rotational move is an edit that is meant to be saved).
  
matt lorono
cad engineer/ecn analyst
silicon valley, ca
i am quite capable of reading vertical text without tilting my head.
to me, the most important concession to reading drawings on computer screens is to use compact sheet sizes.  nicely spaced dimensions with vertical text on vertical dimensions can frequently allow the use of 1 size smaller drawing sheet compared to awkward irregularly spaced dimensions with horizontal text on vertical dimensions.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|小黑屋|几何尺寸与公差论坛

GMT+8, 2024-12-22 10:52 , Processed in 0.036672 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表