几何尺寸与公差论坛

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 487|回复: 0

residential construction circa 1856

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-9-15 18:12:15 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
residential construction circa 1856
i'm working on a project at a distance...
problem: can a two-storey house built in 1856 handle 80 psf floor loads?
what i have: a bunch of very hard-to-read microfiche apperture cards - no framing plans on 'em but they do show romm dimensions and the like, very little time, no access to the building (i can't get a look at the flooring system, either!), a lot of frustration.
my task is to come up with a best guess of what the floor can take - so i need to know what kind of floor joists would typically be used in constrcuting a house in a  suburban us area. so far web searches have yielded not enough.
if anyone knows of good books or web resources please let me know.
thanks in advance!
check out our whitepaper library.
not sure if this helps or just confuses things.
my parents' house was built in 1926 in san francisco.  stud and joist spacings seem comparable to current building practice.  what is primarily different from current construction is that the smallest dimension wood used was 4x4, for both studs and joists.
ttfn
most of the framing   
the only way to determine the strength is to 'get in' and measure it or load test (hope it's strong enough <g>).  it's a matter of discreetly drilling to determine the width and using a small rod (wire) to determine the depth sometimes.  my experience with old framing is that it's either 'really good' or 'really bad'; i've almost never found things to be just right.  you also have to be very careful about some of the neat details and framing.  i've encountered trimmers around stair openings that have been counstructed using mortise and tenon construction (reducing the required strength to the point it was inadequate).
having measured the sizes, you may have to obtain a sample or two to do some testing.  lumber, in the good old days, can be remarkably strong and with a little judgement useable strengths can be determined.  strength of early lumber is due to the seasoning, the closeness of the annual rings, the absence of knots and other defects, the straightness of grain , etc.  also have to check areas where water may have entered the framing; dry-rot (misnomer) can significantly weaken lumber.
my brothers and i build my parents home using salvaged dougfir joists that were about 100 years old.  lots of 20'-24' 2x12's, nearly all perfectly straight grain and very few knots.  old square iron nails were used... the joists were so well seasoned that you couldn't pull nails or drive them in.
because of the age of the home, you may want to reassess the loading.  80 psf is a pretty substantial load, in particular over any sort of area; it's like loading the entire floor with full beer cases stacked 3 deep... <g>
it's very important to see the condition of the wood framing.  in 147 years, it is very possible that wood   
thanks, everyone.
peinc, you are absolutely right! ...and i caveat-ed my guess/analysis with "...i still need to see the floors!"
and thus, the powers that be have listened to me and i'll make a site visit next week.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|小黑屋|几何尺寸与公差论坛

GMT+8, 2025-1-16 01:43 , Processed in 0.037513 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表