几何尺寸与公差论坛

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 497|回复: 0

single double angles for steel bracing

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-9-15 22:53:22 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
single & double angles for steel bracing
both single and double angles are used for bracings in steel structures. back-to-back double angles are more popular since the saving of connection bolt (due to double shear) and no worry about the entire buckling around weakest axis z (in an angle to x or y).  can anybody advise your rule of thumb and experience in using single angle bracing?
thanks in advance.
check out our whitepaper library.
well i use this rule of thumb
you try single angle until angle size 80x80x8
if it exceed more than this you should better use 2 angles back to back for economy
note:- 80x80x8 are dimensions for european sections and
       are 80mms height of both legs and 8mms thickness of
       both. (i do not know it equavliant in american
       sections)
another solution is to use two angles forming star shape
my rule of thumb for the selection of a trial section is to have (a) the slenderness ratio (l/r) less than 180 and (b) sag due to self weight less than l/150.
are these anles in exterior environment or interior? exterior angles, back to back or even star shape have problems with corrosion between the legs - tough to clean and repaint.  a single angle or a wt section is better.
my thumb rule is to use double angles where some compression or bending is likely (star shape is my favorite too). in tension only   
i agree with pmkpe re preference for single angles ot tees (or even hollow structural sections) for agressive environments.
aren't star shapes and tees very poor torsionally? ok for tension only   
thanks for the input.
i have never used star shape, it is just for painting convenience, i guess. but it traps dirt as well, and needs more connection bolts. in addition, the interconnection is not as easy/good as back-to-back angles.  the local buckling of single piece between interconnectors may be larger concern.
whether use angle, wt, hss, or wf can be another big topic. it is determined in many cases by client's or fabricator's preferences without structural reason.
regards,
i believe two angles in starred configuration [preferably equal angles] are excellent in compression, you get quite a large radius of gyration and that will reduce slenderness ratio followed by larger capacity.  i have used this section successfully in a few situations and did not receive any negative feed back so far.
regards
am
i always try to ensure that the bracing system is such that none of the bracing members are in compression. an example of this would be the traditional end bay bracing detail. this way you can use the more efficient tensile capacity of the steel. a single angle in this respect is ideal due to ease of connection.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|小黑屋|几何尺寸与公差论坛

GMT+8, 2025-1-13 02:34 , Processed in 0.038004 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表