几何尺寸与公差论坛

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 450|回复: 0

emperature effects on lumber

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-9-16 13:00:08 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
temperature effects on lumber
i have a project where a customer reported that his attic temperature was 170 degrees on a 90 degree day.  that seems a little warm to me.  obviously with temperatures like that, the building is only subjected to dead loads or wind loads.  the trusses and purlins are designed for snow loads more than anything else.  will there be adverse effects on the lumber due to short term high-temperatures?  i know that the nds has reduction factors due to high temperatures, but my building will never be subjected to high loads at high temperature.
also, what is an acceptable temperature differential between an attic space and outside air?
thanks.
find a job or post a job opening
170 in an attic sounds a little hot to me also. honestly i don't have anything to challenge it though.
obviously with temperatures like that, the building is only subjected to dead loads or wind loads.  
why do you think you don't have to design for live loads?
my building will never be subjected to high loads at high temperature
what a naive comment. how do you know? what makes you think you wouldn't have dead and live load or dead and wind on a hot day.  
i evidently wasn't clear enough.  truss member sizing is determined by snow loads far more than wind loads, live loads, or any other loads.  therefore i can state that the controlling loads that determined the actual   
postframese-
i'm actually going through the process of teaching myself wood design. i've purchased the breyer book which is, by all accounts, the "salmon & johnson" of wood.
they address this very issue and bring up the fact that in many places in the us the temperature routinely exceeds the threshold temperature at which the temperature factor is applied. is it then necessary to use it? usually no. precisely for the reason you mention (likelihood of max temperature and maximum load occurring simultaneously) and because the factor is intended to account for prolonged exposure. prolonged isn't defined, but it is more for things like industrial facilities that will continually be operating at elevated temperatures.
tngolfer-  i think a little common sense would lead you to conclude that the attic is not going to be full of people if the temperature is 170 degrees. i don't think postframese's assumptions are far-fetched or naive.
prolonged exposure to 150 egrees f will adversely affect the capactiy of the wood.  can't re  
wood is mainly cellulose and 170 f will not alter its mechanical properties if the wood is not damp. water and fire are the main enemies of wood.
it is a bad idea to allow so much heat to accumulate in the attic. the ventilation design must be bad. such high temperatures will damage the roofing composite shingles and in a year or two the roof will be leaking and the damage will happen to the wood when it starts rotting.
"the attic is not going to be full of people if the temperature is 170 degrees"
true, but live doesn't only mean people. who knows what might be stored in the attic; books, bags of cement, nanna's china collection ...
frv,
postframese didn't say anywhere in his op it was the bottom chord of the trusses. actually he said the trusses and purlins which won't be affected by attic loading so thanks for the common sense comment which made no sense.  
tngolfer,
i'm not sure what's wrong with you as you are certainly defensive, or smarter than the rest of us, or something.....as your choice of words would suggest.  most of us aren't idiots, and we understand loads, and combinations thereof, and we do have common sense.  i obviously didn't share the whole story, what type of building i'm dealing with, etc for the sake of space.  suffice it to say that i do know the codes, how they are applied, and i do know the application.  if you would just stick to answering the questions instead of criticizing other people's judgement and posts we wouldn't have people having to defend themselves or others.  thanks but no-thanks if you keep responding to posts like you have.
thanks to the rest of you who have objectively answered my question.
apsix-
this is true, but refer to my paraphrased comment by breyer. short-term temperature increases will not adversely affect the   
just happened to look into temperature and wetness effect on wood when updating my spreadsheet stress modules. the national design standard (nds) gives a good discussion and indicates the main concern is sustained high temperature with much less concern for day/night fluctuations. in the end it seems to indicate,"use your engineering judgement".
old ca se
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|小黑屋|几何尺寸与公差论坛

GMT+8, 2025-1-11 22:14 , Processed in 0.035386 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表