几何尺寸与公差论坛

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 467|回复: 0

riangular bracket vs stiffened sea

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-9-16 15:43:50 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
triangular bracket vs stiffened seat
folks,
i have been checking on the difference between a triangular bracket and a stiffned seat.
according to s&j, the major difference seems to be that when the free edge is not parallel to the loading direction, the behavior is different.
on page 10-93 (aisc 13th), stiffener with a seat plate is shown with optional trim lines, one of which is not parallel to the line of load application. triangular bracket plate design calculates capacities based on "z" values for flexural yielding on free edge.
can someone shed some more light into what the real difference between either one is? it seems like a stiffened seat has more capacity than a triangular bracket.
a triangular bracket is more susceptible to buckling on the free edge, because of its declining section.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|小黑屋|几何尺寸与公差论坛

GMT+8, 2025-1-11 14:31 , Processed in 0.034344 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表