几何尺寸与公差论坛

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 472|回复: 0

russ question11

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-9-16 15:58:40 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
truss question!!
the zero member is just for stability of the truss (but you can remove the node and you will not need this member anymore).
usually these are being used to reduce the length of the compression members.
the cross section of this type of member it's not so important - the moment of inertia (both directions) counts.
the general rule is that the member used to brace compression member should be able to develop approx. 10% of the force in the member being braced.
if your truss is significantly long, you might want to consider an unbalanced load, in which case your zero force member will probably receive some load.  
unbalanced loads are sometimes required by code (wind loads on pitched roofs, snow loads) while some are developed at the discretion of the engineer (unbalanced live loads).
for a floor truss, there will always be times when live loads will not be uniformly placed over your tributary area.  therefore, your zero-  
in a symmetrical truss that has partially or fully parallel chords, the web at the center will have zero axial force under uniform load. however, this doesn't mean you can arbitrarily remove that   
for the truss theoretical problem, you can remove the member since you keep the structure in triangles.
for any truss in pratice, you have always nonzero axial force
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|小黑屋|几何尺寸与公差论坛

GMT+8, 2025-1-11 12:27 , Processed in 0.037171 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表