几何尺寸与公差论坛

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 503|回复: 0

ube steel inside corrosion

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-9-16 16:07:52 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
tube steel inside corrosion
has anyone dealt with exterior painted structural steel tubes that have begun to corrode on the inside?  i've been asked about a building in coastal nj with exposed tube steel stair framing.  it's painted outside, but it is corroding from the inside out. is there any way to repair this?
-jcali
check out our whitepaper library.
in coastal sc, i have seen this happen often - things like broken boat trailers to collapsed tubular towers. the only action to "deal" with the corrosion directly, that i have been aware of, was to spray an oily mist into the tubing - if it worked at all, it was not for long.
tubes should be closed (welded caps) to control corrosion. leaving the ends(and any other openings) open is poor practice.
jtmcc.
but, even if caps are welded to the ends, isn't it possible that water vapor could still get inside?  the weld caps don't make it airtight, do they? if condensation occurs inside, won't it be trapped if the ends are capped?
-jc
no.
my goodness yes.
yes, and the amount will be small enough to be immaterial.
this is the standard method of solving your problem. if you work with tube, i'm suprised you're not familiar with it.
jtmcc.

yes, we usually do use the end caps in our designs because that's the way it has "always been done".  i'm just rethinking it and raising the question. isn't that what this forum is for?
the tube structure in question isn't my design.  i'm trying to help a colleague resolve a problem at his property. i don't see how adding an end cap is the standard way of solving a corrosion problem that already exists.
-jc     
this really is a common thing when using structural tube, if i took the time to look, i could refer you to many printed references to the practice.
everybody i know that works with tube is aware of this, from structural engineers to welders helpers in the shop.
jtmcc.
tube is a poor choice in situations where moisture is present and corrosion can be an issue. usually end caps or galanization from the start are the best alternatives. one could try finding a rust sealer and may be injection spraying the inside of the tube to seal the rust (remember no air/moisture = no rust). a question would be is there a potential for injury or economical lose if collapse occurs? how much steel is required to hold the loads? unfortunatly, unless you use a metal sonar thickness measurer these types of situations can become ticking timebombs... (ie no way of inspecting the inside of the   
jcali...back to your original question...what to do. not much.  you can do as slideruleera correctly suggested, but he also gave you the long term result.
at this point, you have to investigate the amount of section loss and compare it to the expected loads, and recommend replacement if you have significant capacity reduction.
you can seal up the ends at this point, but if you have a lot of corrosion product in there, it has already imbibed enough water to last the corrosion process for quite a while, even without addition oxygen or moisture.  if the tubes are short (10 feet or less) you can blast clean the inside and coat them internally.  not cheap to do this, but it will prolong the life.  you can also clean them, cap them, then evacuate the air from them.  this helps a lot.
this thread reminds me of an ongoing 70 year old debate within the aircraft industry of how to corrosion proof the insides of 4130 structural tube used for engine mounts and fuselage frames in tube and fabric airplanes.
one school believed in the sealed tube theory and made no effort to treat the insides of the tubes. others would coat the insides with linseed oil before welding.  some after welding the assembly would drill small holes in the tubes, inject linseed oil, drain them and plug the holes with small rivets.  
after 70 years the jury is still out because you can find examples of success and failure with each of the methods.
thanks aerodog for being the voice of reason.
this discussion was beginning to sound less than professional.  once in awhile, a question may seem outright basic, or border on stupidity based on the knowledge and experience of the person reading it.  but don't forget, no one engineer is all-knowing, and everyone is subject to different experiences.  this forum should be a place that an engineer, or engineer-in-training, can ask a basic question, if need be.  it should also be a place where a very involved technical question can be asked, as the more opinions gathered, the better the possible solution. i have found many helpful hints, or at least some information that has pointed me in the right direction in these fora.  many engineers are working as the only engineer in a construction firm, or a manufacturing facility, and may have no peer with which to consult. i don't believe a professional should ever put down a fellow professional for asking a question. it never hurts to get a second opinion. my only warning to all (and i believe most of you already are aware of this) is that because of the variety of experience levels of the many persons in these fora, the information provided should always be verified with further document research, etc.  you alone, as the professional-of-record, are liable for your final work product.
now, back to the subject at hand . .
i believe, as aerodog does, that the jury is still out.  however, there are several items to consider . . .
large pipes and tubes, such as single-pole sign posts can be "seal" welded using e60 electrodes after the structural welding is complete.  even with this, the large interior volume is susceptible to moisture and subsequent condensation.  usually, the deterioration of these poles begins at the weld between the pole and the base plate, where the condensation usually collects.
smaller pipes and tubes are best protected by galvanizing inside and out, followed by capping, etc.  many assemblies have small penetrations (bolt holes, etc.) where water can enter, particularly when rain is followed by a drop in temperatures, and the reduced pressure inside will suck the moisture inside.  other assemblies, that may be fully sealed, still seem to allow moisture penetration, as the welding and sealing may not be perfect.  it doesn't take very much moisture to begin corrosion.  if moisture can penetrate, so can the air that is needed for oxidation.  low points in the assembly are collection points for the condensation, and this is usually where the corrosion begins.  ambient temperature changes may cause the water to evaporate and condense within the assembly, exposing the steel to further oxidation potential.  i have seen many welded steel tube amusement rides, railings, etc. that have corroded from the inside with no apparent means of moisture penetration.
i believe it is virtually impossible to completely seal steel pipes and tubes against corrosion from within.  there is no easy answer, and in some cases, it may be more suitable to provide small weep holes at low collection points, such that any condensate can weep out.
in short, you should study each pipe and tube assembly as an individual case, and ascertain which is the most effective means of protecting against corrosion from the inside.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|小黑屋|几何尺寸与公差论坛

GMT+8, 2025-1-11 11:22 , Processed in 0.036969 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表