几何尺寸与公差论坛

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 505|回复: 0

unbalanced snow load ibc 2000

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-9-16 16:56:20 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
unbalanced snow load ibc 2000
i am designing roof rafters for a single family residence.  if i apply an unbalanced snow load, the rafters in the ibc residential code tables do not work.  (my model includes a ceiling joist).  i can only get the rafters in the table to work with balanced snow loads.
does anybody know of a stipulation in the code where you do not have to apply unbalanced snow loads to residential buildings?
thanks!
check out our whitepaper library.
so why dont you design with an unbalanced snow load.
i don't want to design the roof for unbalanced snow load if i don't have to.  i was already accused by another engineer of being overconservative with the roof design on a previous residential design project.  i would like to know definatively either way.
the leeward drifts from the asce 7 hammer a rafter design with 150% pf.  as i understand it, this is what the ibc says to do irrespective of occupany (i=1.0).
you are governed by the irc.  the ibc is a code book whereas i view the irc as more of a recipe book. i am doing good to stay up with the ibc changes every three years and thus do not profess to know that much about the irc. look in the irc and i expect it says the span tables are ok w/o drifting.  irc r301.2.3.
for what it's worth, i design any rafter and its connections for the drifted snow condition.   
check whether ibc and asce 7 even govern this design.  usually, the irc controls residential design and you may not have to even refer to the other two.
if it is single family with 3 stories or less, then irc is your code.  if your ground snow load is 70 psf or less, you use the tables in irc (chap 5,6 and 8).  i don't have the commentary handy, but i think your issue is taken into account in the table values.
zcp
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|小黑屋|几何尺寸与公差论坛

GMT+8, 2025-1-11 06:40 , Processed in 0.038522 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表