几何尺寸与公差论坛

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 820|回复: 0

【转帖】calling out 00 threads on drawing

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-4-29 18:44:20 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
calling out #00 threads on drawing
i’m checking a drawing that has #00 threads.  (i realize unm threads are usually preferred but this part is mating with existing components.)
what is the correct way to call this out on the drawing, specifically what thread spec should i specify/reference?
i know a lot of people don’t reference the spec on drawings but y14.6 recommends doing so (section 3.2) and normally we reference b1.1, b1.10m or b1.13m as appropriate.
if i understand correctly the thread form is same as unified so should i specify it as an equivalent uns or specify the threads as american national thread form?
also at the moment the callouts say #00-96-2b or #00-90-2b but from the below link i understand the thread class would normally be 3b.
wow, you are almost in the turf where you are spec'ing your own threads.  you might need to be very specific, especially if the old american national standard wasn't specific.  
there a methods used in un threads that if employed may allow the threads to follow the standard even if they are not mentioned in the standard.  i don't have access to the thread standards, so i can't check to see how thread forms are calculated (other than generalities coverd in the machinery's handbook)
matt
cad engineer/ecn analyst
silicon valley, ca
that's the uns i referred to, s stands for special (asme b1.1 -2003 section 6.4 especially).  i'm depressingly familiar with special threads to un form as we use them a lot on our fine adjusting screws.
.75x40, .25x80 & 100  etc.
the link i gave above has a calculator for uns threads which seems pretty accurate from the time we verified it.
my concern is if i spec them as .047-90 (or 96) uns will this just confuse the vendor.  also if the standard taps are for a class 3 then i'd probably want to specify class 3.
one thought was to spec as uns with #00 in brackets for reference but i'm still not sure about even putting uns in this case.
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|小黑屋|几何尺寸与公差论坛

GMT+8, 2024-12-22 17:01 , Processed in 0.035177 second(s), 20 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表