几何尺寸与公差论坛

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 494|回复: 0

asce 7-05 possible typo

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-9-7 13:09:33 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
asce 7-05 possible typo
i've stumbled on something that i'd like to run past some seasoned earthquake structural engineers:
in asce 7-05, equations 15.4-2 and 15.4-4, the variable s1 is used.  it seems to me an sm1 or sd1 should be there because s1 is not adjusted for soil type or spectral response.  is this a typo or was it really intended to be this way?
my case is for soil class d and the s1 numbers on the map are based on soil class b.  the fv and fa site coefficients are pretty substantial to make soil type changes (tables 11.4-1 and 11.4-2).  if s1 is used and it is supposed to be sm1 or sd1, the result would be very unconservative.
find a job or post a job opening
while i do not claim to be a seasoned eq engineer, i looked at this, and while it is hard to follow since asce 7-05 is in a new format, i believe that eq.15.4-4 is intended to replace the cs min equations 12.8-5 and 12.8-6, which also use s1.  i believe that the r values from table 15.4-2 are to be used in the chapter 12.8 cs equations, where eqs.12.8-2, -3, and -4 use either sds or sd1.
in short, i don't think that this is a typo and it probably isn't unconservative because it defines the lower bound, and 15.4-1 and 15.4-2 is more severe than the minimums in 12.8.
that makes perfect sense, and after re-reading the associated sections, i think you're right.
if anyone has hard knowledge of this being the case, please weigh in.
thanks
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|小黑屋|几何尺寸与公差论坛

GMT+8, 2025-1-11 05:49 , Processed in 0.037318 second(s), 20 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表