几何尺寸与公差论坛

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 641|回复: 0

beam unbraced length

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-9-7 15:09:19 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
beam unbraced length
i would like to get some opinions on the maximum unbraced length that others design for. i will usually limit my max unbraced length to about 12' before i add in braces, no matter how much extra capacity the beam should still have under the loading. after doing this, i will also check that my allowable stress from the equations is still above about 15ksi or so also.  
is this overkill? are others using larger unbraced lengths if the stress is still under the theoretical allowable?
check out our whitepaper library.
if there is no torsion present, i am happy to use the full unbraced length consistent with the reduced stress formulae.
for  practical point of view and erection point of view, 10' to 12' is a right choice for unsupported length. if it is designed as a plane frame , restrict to 10 -12' and for space frame with/wo  p-delta analysis one can go for full length as all types of forces will be called in.
for  practical point of view and erection point of view, 10' to 12' is a right choice for unsupported length. if it is designed as a plane frame , restrict to 10 -12' and for space frame with/wo  p-delta analysis one can go for full length as all types of forces will be called in.
how ever , in case of requirement like in portals , one has to go for full length regardless of 2d or 3d .
theoretically, i guess if it works by the formulas no matter what unbraced length it is, i think you would be covered in the eyes of the building official. i used to design with that state of mind until i got the advice from other engineers later.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|小黑屋|几何尺寸与公差论坛

GMT+8, 2025-1-11 20:16 , Processed in 0.035589 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表