daily meeting - 12-Feb-2009

huangyhg

1.       PR 259371 - fixed #2------apply the feature type rule of FCF (orientation dimensions) to legacy orientation dimensions, only four feature types (plane, line, cylinder, cone) are allowed for legacy orientation tolerance. Now set review to Don T again.

2.       PR259155 - fixed, Rick told me FCF specification rules need not work for CAD FCF in IP V1.2.

Supported the creation of CAD FCF (true position) with MC and fixed memory leaks from FCF project. Filed PR259703 - Detected memory leaks when imported a CATIA model via CATIA 5 DCT – set the PR to Porter. Now set review to Porter.





For PR 259371, Don T told me FCF orientation feature type rule should be same as legacy orientation dimension. Today added this rule into legacy orientation dimension.

Now set review to Don T again.

For PR259155, yesterday Rick told me FCF specification rules need not work for CAD FCF in IP 1.2.

Completed code to support CAD FCF creation with Material Condition and fixed some memory leaks from FCF project. Filed a new PR259703 - Detected memory leaks when imported a CATIA model using CATIA 5 DCT – set this new PR to Porter.

huangyhg

[11:01:27 PM] Dave Petrizze says: Please enter your status here. I have a long drawn out conference call beginning now so I don't know when i'll be able to contact you.
[11:02:59 PM] Dave Petrizze says: Yanhua, the PRs have been added.
[11:03:58 PM] Jared Hess says: Yesterday: Worked on web site to release v42 MR3. Worked on answering questions from temp worker to get images in localized versions. Today: Will work on documentation.
[11:04:18 PM] yanhua Huang says: thanks, dave, please add PR259377-  a stop Rel.
[11:04:23 PM] Don Ruggieri says: Testing -

Gear yesterday, had to abandon that, waiting for fix to Spiral Bevel

Starting NC testing today

Continued modifications to test plan itself
[11:05:45 PM] Dave Petrizze says: Yanhua, I've added that one now too.
[11:05:47 PM] yanhua Huang says: 1. PR 259371 - fixed #2------apply the feature type rule of FCF (orientation dimensions) to legacy orientation dimensions, only four feature types (plane, line, cylinder, cone) are allowed for legacy orientation tolerance. Now set review to Don T again.
2. PR259155 - fixed, Rick told me FCF specification rules need not work for CAD FCF in IP V1.2.
Supported the creation of CAD FCF (true position) with MC and fixed memory leaks from FCF project. Filed PR259703 - Detected memory leaks when imported a CATIA model via CATIA 5 DCT – set the PR to Porter. Now set review to Porter.
[11:06:15 PM] Donald Turcotte says: 259593  - per unit straightness fixed
259360 - reviewed , found problems
259371 - reviewed , needs also to be applied to legacy dimensions

259521 - reviewed
This is just a merge of #257293  which has already been made in V44B and reviewed.  

However, this merge included the change for #258965 which has not yet been reviewed.
[11:06:30 PM] Steve Barber says: #259539 - backed out the change for #251206 since the logic on the CRO assumes only 1 label per data object. ##251206 should really be an enhancement
[11:06:57 PM] Robert Smith says: PR 257443 - finished with changes, reviewing with Dave today
PR 259540 - Its still an issue in 44b. Looking for a fix.
[11:07:23 PM] Dave Petrizze says: Bob, please review with Steve.
[11:26:13 PM] Dave Petrizze says: Don R. what can we do about 258561
[11:28:36 PM] Don Ruggieri says: Its tricky.  We don't see it every time, maybe once every few weeks when running off machines on the factory floor.  Other than that, we cannot force the problem.

Ted says he made a change, now all we can do is wait until we see it again to test his fix
[11:29:17 PM] Don Ruggieri says: Within days after they run the machine off, it is shipped out, so we can't ask them to hold onto one, as shipping is critical to them in the factory
[11:29:33 PM] Dave Petrizze says: Maybe Stop Release is the wrong status for this PR now?
[11:29:54 PM] Don Ruggieri says: Yes, I haven't read that report in a while.  Either that or OPEN is the wrong setting right now
[11:30:03 PM] Don Ruggieri says: maybe RESOLVED is better, as he did make a potential fix
[11:30:12 PM] Dave Petrizze says: I agree.
[11:30:32 PM] Don Ruggieri says: I'll set it to RESOLVED at least until we can test it again
[11:31:02 PM] Dave Petrizze says: I've done the same
[11:38:28 PM] Dave Petrizze says: Steve, any progress on 258893?
[11:39:22 PM] Steve Barber says: none since it deals with section cut
[11:39:39 PM] Dave Petrizze says: what do you need to resolve this?
[11:40:14 PM] Steve Barber says: bret to look at it or transfer his understanding of his changes into my brain.
[11:44:48 PM] Steve Barber says: or to anyone in the reporting group.
[12:03:09 AM] Don Ruggieri says: My stomach is growling, I am missing my snack time.  Will we be having a call soon?
[12:06:40 AM] Edited by Dave Petrizze, 12:07:00 AM go ahead and take your break
[12:07:10 AM] Don Ruggieri says: its less painful that way. . . .
[1:11:21 AM] Dave Petrizze says: We'll have to conduct this review from my mobile phone as I need to leave for the office.  Who has SkypeOut?
[1:12:22 AM] Bret Naylor says: Dave, i do
[1:12:45 AM] Dave Petrizze says: k, I'll contact you when ready.
[1:12:50 AM] Bret Naylor says: ok

huangyhg

Working on PR259360, Last week Don T reviewed code and reopened this PR, now Fixed Don T reported issues –

1.  Select all features from SLT3 to SCN1 and Create.  Then all location dimensions get X,Y,Z axes only.

2.  Select all features from SLT3 to SLT4. Then in Tolerances group box for ALL, enter Plus of .1, Minus of .1, then Create.  All location dimensions get X, Y, Z, D, L axes including circles.  Note that if you don't enter any tolerances but just select Create then slots get X, Y, Z, D, L, but circles correctly get only X, Y, Z, D.

Now set review to Don T again.

Please do more tests on editing legacy location.

17-2-2009

huangyhg

Working on PR 259379, I am investigating the PR.
For location, there are 20 pop-out axes in edit window. But in fact, just has 17 axes in location dialog. “M” (Measured) axis is not belonging to location. Should we remove “M” from the axes list? Don T. told me he will have to research this since this has been in PC-DIMS a long time. I will create a topic about axes in our wiki forum.
2009-2-18