几何尺寸与公差论坛

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 589|回复: 0

super dead load

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-9-16 12:13:07 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
super dead load
hi everybody!
i'm a spanish architect (here in spain architects use to design the frameworks of his buildings) and i'm beginning with a very famous program whose menu bar is, of course, in english...
i don't know what's the meaning of some terms referred to loads. i suppose that you easily will be able to answer me: which is the different between "dead load" and "super dead load"?
here in spain, we have "peso propio" (the own weigh of the structural elements, for example, the weigh of a flat slab or a beam), the "carga muerta" (translated "dead load", for example, the weigh of a tiled floor) and the "sobrecarga" (i suppose this is the same that your live load: people, furniture or traffic weigh)...
could you help me? thanks,
dieste.
check out our whitepaper library.
i think it may be referring to 'super imposed dead load'. in short, super imposed dead load is the dead load on the structure excluding the self weight.
i agree with shin25, it is probably "super-imposed dead load".  
the only difference i might draw is that it can include the self-weight, e.g. for an elevated slab on steel beam the weight of the slab would be a super-imposed dead load but is still part of the self-weight of the structure - although not the   
that makes sense.
so, "dead load" and nothing else is the same that self weigh?
thanks,
dieste.
super imposed dead loads are usually applied on the finished structure and act on the composite section.  
sshin25 is correct.  
in composite beam design, in order to figure the deflection after composite action has taken place, the term is used to differentiate between dead loads applied prior to (dead load)and after (superimposed deadload) composite action.
mike mccann
mccann engineering
msquared-
that is correct, but in my explanation i was careful not to use the term composite.  quite often, even in a composite building, many beams are designed as non-composite for various reasons (e.g. the beam is too short to get the required number of studs for minimum % composite, you have a cantilever situation with negative bending).  these were the situations i was referring to.
ok.  gotcha.  thanks.
mike mccann
mccann engineering
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|小黑屋|几何尺寸与公差论坛

GMT+8, 2025-1-12 03:21 , Processed in 0.036896 second(s), 19 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4 Licensed

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表