查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-07, 10:17 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 adjacent foundation elemen

adjacent foundation element
looking for practice is setting elevation of adjacent foundation elements. for spread and/or continuous wall footing(s) i have used the rule of thumb of 2 horizontal to 1 vertical unless soils report says something like 1 to 1 would be acceptable. have used the same general rules for adjacent pile caps, bottom of caissons. are there any other opinions or systems that do not follow this general practice?

the us army corps of engineers "engineering and design - bearing capacity of soils" says that the spacing should be a minimum of 1.5 x the footing width
quote (em 1110-1-1905):
foundations on footings spaced sufficiently close together to intersect adjacent shear zones may decrease bearing capacity of each foundation. spacings between footings should be at least 1.5b, to minimize any reduction in bearing capacity.
(footing width = b)
here is the link to the document, see page 1-14
we usually recommend 5 horizontal to 1 vertical "steps".
in lieu of stepping down footings due to proximity of adjacent footings, you could consider excavating and pouring a lean conc mix, say f'c=1500 psi & unreinforced...bott of lean conc fill to comply with the 2:1 and then place your footings at the higher elevation on top of the lean concrete mix.
eric1037 - 5 horz to 1 vert...is that for bott of caissons? seems high for typ footings.
you can place foundations closer together as long as you account for overlapping shear zones for bearing capacity concerns as well as overlapping zones of stress increase for settlement analysis.
for most cases, the 5 horizontal to 1 vertical will reduce overlapping zones. however, for large foundations, this may need to be increased.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)