几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 查看单个帖子

building separation
per ibc 2003 sec. 1620.4.5, srss method is used to check separation of adjacent structures, to avoid seismic pounding. i have a new building being constructed next to an existing urm building, and no plans are available of the existing... does anyone have advice on how to rationalize a reasonable delta-m for the existing structure? can it simply be based off the ibc allowable drift limits for a "masonry shearwall building" (ie. 0.007hsx)? obviously hoping for an easy method, to avoid in-depth analysis of the existing structure. this situation must come up all the time in downtown areas(?)
thanks!

__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]

2009-09-07, 05:42 PM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	building separation building separation per ibc 2003 sec. 1620.4.5, srss method is used to check separation of adjacent structures, to avoid seismic pounding. i have a new building being constructed next to an existing urm building, and no plans are available of the existing... does anyone have advice on how to rationalize a reasonable delta-m for the existing structure? can it simply be based off the ibc allowable drift limits for a "masonry shearwall building" (ie. 0.007hsx)? obviously hoping for an easy method, to avoid in-depth analysis of the existing structure. this situation must come up all the time in downtown areas(?) thanks! __________________ 借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心! [url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]