几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 查看单个帖子

design spectral response
does anyone know of a good source for determining spectral response values for alaska other than asce and ibc maps? i am reviewing some calculations, and came across sd1 and sds values with resolution to the thousandths. is there a source that provides this, or am i looking at someone's work who had a really good eye for interpolation?
there's a program out there that gives you ss and s1 by zip code, but not to that degree of accuracy. there's a point at which the numbers don't even make sense to use, you know? i'd say go to the nearest tenth.
strikengineer,
ss and s1 are in the maps, not sds and sd1. when you take the 2/3 factor to get to sds and sd1, you could get too many sig figs.
you might get more sigs figs from the nehrp program, i can't re
i think ucfse has it explained. it's sort of like this:
2 + 2 = 4.00000000

2009-09-08, 06:00 PM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	design spectral response design spectral response does anyone know of a good source for determining spectral response values for alaska other than asce and ibc maps? i am reviewing some calculations, and came across sd1 and sds values with resolution to the thousandths. is there a source that provides this, or am i looking at someone's work who had a really good eye for interpolation? there's a program out there that gives you ss and s1 by zip code, but not to that degree of accuracy. there's a point at which the numbers don't even make sense to use, you know? i'd say go to the nearest tenth. strikengineer, ss and s1 are in the maps, not sds and sd1. when you take the 2/3 factor to get to sds and sd1, you could get too many sig figs. you might get more sigs figs from the nehrp program, i can't re i think ucfse has it explained. it's sort of like this: 2 + 2 = 4.00000000 __________________ 借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心! [url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]