几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 查看单个帖子

follow up on torsional constant j
there was a previous thread (
calculation of torsional constants is fairly non intuitive, for open re-entrant sections made of plates.
i haven't got a value for u channel, but for an i section that is roughly equivalent i get 672e3, which does not seem unreasonable. typically j for open channels is ~1% of that for similar box sections.
however, using polyakov's spreadsheet off the internet i get a touch less than 3e8, which is frankly unbelievable.
cheers
greg locock
for a channel the correct way to calculate j, as with all open plate sections, is a summation of (1/3)bt^3 for each linear piece of the section. so for your shape which i believe i am interpreting to have two 400mmx12.5mm sides and one 200mmx12.5mm side the j value would be 1/3*2*400mm*12.5mm^3 + 1/3*200mm*12.5mm^3 = 651,042mm.
that would be where i was going wrong then.
i was looking at 'b' and 't' in a global sense. so for the 400mm side sections b=12.5mm and t=400mm. when i should have been using t=12.5mm regardless of orientation.
see this forum, knowledge management at its finest.

2009-09-09, 01:02 PM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	follow up on torsional constant j follow up on torsional constant j there was a previous thread ( calculation of torsional constants is fairly non intuitive, for open re-entrant sections made of plates. i haven't got a value for u channel, but for an i section that is roughly equivalent i get 672e3, which does not seem unreasonable. typically j for open channels is ~1% of that for similar box sections. however, using polyakov's spreadsheet off the internet i get a touch less than 3e8, which is frankly unbelievable. cheers greg locock for a channel the correct way to calculate j, as with all open plate sections, is a summation of (1/3)bt^3 for each linear piece of the section. so for your shape which i believe i am interpreting to have two 400mmx12.5mm sides and one 200mmx12.5mm side the j value would be 1/32400mm12.5mm^3 + 1/3200mm*12.5mm^3 = 651,042mm. that would be where i was going wrong then. i was looking at 'b' and 't' in a global sense. so for the 400mm side sections b=12.5mm and t=400mm. when i should have been using t=12.5mm regardless of orientation. see this forum, knowledge management at its finest. __________________ 借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心! [url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]