查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-10, 11:56 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 lrfd dynamic load allowance on piles

lrfd dynamic load allowance on piles
using the aashto lrfd code (3.6.2.1), i understand that the load used to design piles at end bents, which are entirely below ground, would not have the dynamic load allowance (im) included with the truck live load calculations. as for an interior bent, where piles are partially above ground, i understand that im would be included with the truck live load calculations in determining the loads used to design the piles.
my question then is...when stating the tonnage needed for piles (i.e. based on bearing--some distance below ground on stable soil), would i still include im with the live load? i plan on designing the piles for ll + im, but i'm not sure if i need to include im on the truck load when stating the factored design load in tons, specifically because the tonnage needed is resisted by bearing (or skin friction) of the pile below ground, where im is not usually included. hopefully, you see why i'm torn whether or not i should include im in the tonnage; if i do, it increases the required ultimate bearing (which is the factored design load divided by the geotechnical resistance factor) by about 60 tons!
i appreciate your suggestions...
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)