查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-15, 10:32 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 one-way pt on steel beams

one-way pt on steel beams?
hi fellow structural engineers,
i've had an architect propose that we have steel beams support our 34' one-way pt slab. it's got me a little concerned. we have had an old-school se consulatant claim that this is fine with an l/600 non-composite design criteria.... and he proposes add studs at 12" anyway. which seems like a bit of self-deception: that there should be a real design composite criteria if you are going to put in studs.
i'm wondering if we'll be having conflicts, shrinkage, cracking, vibration, long-term creep etc, etc?
is there any real design criteria for this, rather than a (unverified) "rule of thumb?" i have trouble believing off-the-hip "rules of thumb" will stand up in a court room. not unless someone really verifies that it is the standard of care in the local engineering community.
thanks for your help!
mike in seattle

what is the problem or concern that you are questioning? l/600 seems like high quality construction for live load deflection after completion. i would suggest shored concrete forms so plastic concrete does not deform the beam prior to gaining concrete strength and post tension compression.
hi civilperson,
thank you for your quick reply.
well, so i imagined the pt slab would be on flat forms, but wouldn't that make the situation worse by having both a live load transfer and a dead load transfer once the forms are pulled?
as for l/600, aside from a m/s < fcr.stress -> 6.7*root_f'c, what is the tolerance of concrete for deflection?
thank you!
mike
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)