几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 查看单个帖子

prequalified smf rbs
question regarding prequalified smf reduced beam section connection design:

according to seismic provisions section 9.6, in the equation for mpb for prequalified rbs includes 1.1ry*fyb*zrbs, however, in the aisc 358 section 5.4, it directs you to eq 5.8-5 where mpr = cpr*ry*fy*ze.

why are these two equatons using different values, 1.1 vs. cpr?

check out our whitepaper library.
per fema 350, june 2000, commentary section 3.2.4(see link below), in calculating mpr the coefficent 1.1 was used in the 1997 aisc seismic provisions, however, fema testing determined that for most connection types, the peak moment developed is higher than using 1.1, therefore the cpr factor was developed, limited by 1.2.

2009-09-15, 02:33 PM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	prequalified smf rbs prequalified smf rbs question regarding prequalified smf reduced beam section connection design: according to seismic provisions section 9.6, in the equation for mpb for prequalified rbs includes 1.1ryfybzrbs, however, in the aisc 358 section 5.4, it directs you to eq 5.8-5 where mpr = cprryfy*ze. why are these two equatons using different values, 1.1 vs. cpr? check out our whitepaper library. per fema 350, june 2000, commentary section 3.2.4(see link below), in calculating mpr the coefficent 1.1 was used in the 1997 aisc seismic provisions, however, fema testing determined that for most connection types, the peak moment developed is higher than using 1.1, therefore the cpr factor was developed, limited by 1.2. __________________ 借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心! [url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]