几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 查看单个帖子

random testing for anchor capacity
is there an acceptance quality level, in percent, prescribed for mechanical or grouted anchors?
thanks
vod
5% fractile per aci appendix d, but that may be intended for lab settings, not field results. ask hilti or simpson.
yes, i had checked hilti, i noticed a sample spec from their website with regards to concrete anchors and i believe they specify a minimum of 10% (as 25% was in brackets). if one has a lot of anchors that equates to a lot of anchors to be tested.
i was hoping to find a statistical basis to reduce the number of tests with the same or better level of confidence and thus wish to use acceptance quality level used in six sigma.
to me, 10% infers that they do not have alot of confidence with the installation process.
the anchors i need to test are not hilti and thus i am looking for a code reference for guidance.
vod
look in here and in aci 355.
thanks,
i looked at this document and it states the minimum sample size of 5 so it doesn't really help relate as a function of the total. i don't have aci 355.
i notice that nysdot specifies that all installed anchors for my situation (for a bridge railing system) must be tested, whereas minnesota state once used to do this in-house testing with a minimum of three.
so between hilti, ny and min states it appears all over the place.
regards
vod

2009-09-15, 04:28 PM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	random testing for anchor capacity random testing for anchor capacity is there an acceptance quality level, in percent, prescribed for mechanical or grouted anchors? thanks vod 5% fractile per aci appendix d, but that may be intended for lab settings, not field results. ask hilti or simpson. yes, i had checked hilti, i noticed a sample spec from their website with regards to concrete anchors and i believe they specify a minimum of 10% (as 25% was in brackets). if one has a lot of anchors that equates to a lot of anchors to be tested. i was hoping to find a statistical basis to reduce the number of tests with the same or better level of confidence and thus wish to use acceptance quality level used in six sigma. to me, 10% infers that they do not have alot of confidence with the installation process. the anchors i need to test are not hilti and thus i am looking for a code reference for guidance. vod look in here and in aci 355. thanks, i looked at this document and it states the minimum sample size of 5 so it doesn't really help relate as a function of the total. i don't have aci 355. i notice that nysdot specifies that all installed anchors for my situation (for a bridge railing system) must be tested, whereas minnesota state once used to do this in-house testing with a minimum of three. so between hilti, ny and min states it appears all over the place. regards vod __________________ 借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心! [url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]