查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-15, 11:38 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 slenderness of a tension member

slenderness of a tension member
the effective length factor, k, does not apply to the slenderness ratio recommendation for tension members. see aisc specification section b7. in other words, use k=1 for all cases in tension.
yes,
and additionally: aisc does not mandate the limit on the slenderness ratio, but rather recommends a limit. they use the word "preferably".
agree in determining the slenderness on actual length for members in tension, or take k=1.
... and the preferably is preferable, will the member some day enter in -even marginal- compression?. i think they degraded it to preferably because otherwise the cable or tensors practice would become too much in evidence.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)