几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 查看单个帖子

strength limit states for local buckling
i attended a seminar awhile back, and the most interesting thing was the subject of compact sections.
- most w-sections are always compact
- only one w-section has a chance to be non-compact for fy=36ksi -- w6x15
- only seven w-sections have a chance to be non-compact for fy=50ksi -- w6x15, w8x10, w10x12, w12x65, w14x90, w14x99, w40x174 --- so if you do not use these members you do not need to check for compact sections, and if you do they are 95%+ of the time will be compact.
- all c-sections and mc-sections are compact for fy=36ksi and fy=50ksi
fyi
except if you are resisting seismic forces. then the compactness limits are more stringent.
i personally have not calced every possible scenerio for the
taro, are you referring here to the requirements for compactness limits in aisc seismic provisions (table i-8-1)versus lfrd design spec (table b5.1)?
yes, if you are using a response modification factor greater than 3, you need to use more compact sections to achieve the ductility.

2009-09-16, 10:27 AM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	strength limit states for local buckling strength limit states for local buckling i attended a seminar awhile back, and the most interesting thing was the subject of compact sections. - most w-sections are always compact - only one w-section has a chance to be non-compact for fy=36ksi -- w6x15 - only seven w-sections have a chance to be non-compact for fy=50ksi -- w6x15, w8x10, w10x12, w12x65, w14x90, w14x99, w40x174 --- so if you do not use these members you do not need to check for compact sections, and if you do they are 95%+ of the time will be compact. - all c-sections and mc-sections are compact for fy=36ksi and fy=50ksi fyi except if you are resisting seismic forces. then the compactness limits are more stringent. i personally have not calced every possible scenerio for the taro, are you referring here to the requirements for compactness limits in aisc seismic provisions (table i-8-1)versus lfrd design spec (table b5.1)? yes, if you are using a response modification factor greater than 3, you need to use more compact sections to achieve the ductility. __________________ 借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心! [url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]