查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-16, 04:25 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 wo way slab with beams

two way slab with beams
hello pals,
im designing a two way slab with beamsfff"> which is cannot be done by direct design method but the problem is i dont know to how to used equivalent frame method, i believe that it needs a table brows for nonprismatic and the like to get the work done, dont have much researched sources in our locality but i try to solve it any way, first i compare it to direct design method for it say's that the result of two method are closedfff"> if the frame in question is workable with direct design method, meet aci requirements to wit; span ratio, load ratio and 10% least column offset. the result indeed in the end span, the exterior negative moment is closed result but the interior negative moment is way down by 10%, the distribution factor is correct, fixed end moment used wl2/12fff">, moment carry over 0.50fff">.
moment carry over factor and fixed end moment used are correct?
your reply is much appreciated;
fratrowie
well it's been a about 5 years since i even considered a two way slab. i'm more of a steel guy anyways.
i'm not too clear on your situation and some of the criteria. can you not use the direct method because you have less than two spans (13.6.1.1)? if this is a small area i think i'd just use wl^2/8 top and bottom to be conservative and be done with it.
that's just my two cents worth.
whoops! meant 3 spans!
socks15,
i used an identical frame with three spans in this comparison of the two methods, direct design method as appoximation to check the results, hoping that i can sort out the nonprismatic equivalent frame method.
thanks for your reply, merry chrismas.
fratrowie
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)