几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 查看单个帖子

ufc 4-023-03 progressive collapse
is anyone familiar with the unified facilities criteria for progressive collapse?
i have a question on the tie force method in section 3-1. it says that you must demonstrate that the elements are able to withstand the required tensile tie forces while undergoing a rotation of 0.2 rad. how would you go about calculating the tensile capacity of a beam while it's rotating 0.2 radians at it's supports?
my guess is that you must have the connection already detailed and then calculate the forces in the bolts under a rotation of 0.2 radians in the connection. and then add to those stresses the stresses from the axial force from the beam. actually this procedure makes sense after typing it. does anyone know a proper method for achieving this?

the required tie strength is defined for each material type in chapters 4 through 8. ufc 4-023-03 gives a prescribed tensile force capacity that must be achieved based on a percentage of the gravity load seen by the tributary area between each tie. check for capacity requirements for internal ties, peripheral ties, external column ties, etc.
thanks, it also says that you can use the floor system already in place to resist these tie forces. so for a composite slab on metal deck, it says that you can use the composite beams as long as they can undergo a rotation of 0.2 rad + the tensile tie force. i'm just wondering how to design a
i assume you're looking at the version that just came out a couple of weeks ago?
.2 radians is 11.5 degrees. a really big rotation. you're not going to get any bolted connection to work. they're trying to push you to using the reinforcing in the slab as the ties, as you stated. look at figure d-4 on page 123.
the days of using your primary structural elements as ties are over.
i wasn't aware that the newest version had already been released. i attended a seminar concerning the new version and the intent was that the structural steel framework was not eligible to be utilized as ties anymore. as gumpmaster mentioned, the required rotation is not feasible with steel connections. reinforcement in the slab is the best bet.
thanks gumpmasterflex. that's what i needed to hear.
i've attached the new version that i've been working off of. it does state in section 3-1.3.1 that you can use the structural
all ufc's are available for free from the following web site:

2009-09-16, 04:47 PM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	ufc 4-023-03 progressive collapse ufc 4-023-03 progressive collapse is anyone familiar with the unified facilities criteria for progressive collapse? i have a question on the tie force method in section 3-1. it says that you must demonstrate that the elements are able to withstand the required tensile tie forces while undergoing a rotation of 0.2 rad. how would you go about calculating the tensile capacity of a beam while it's rotating 0.2 radians at it's supports? my guess is that you must have the connection already detailed and then calculate the forces in the bolts under a rotation of 0.2 radians in the connection. and then add to those stresses the stresses from the axial force from the beam. actually this procedure makes sense after typing it. does anyone know a proper method for achieving this? the required tie strength is defined for each material type in chapters 4 through 8. ufc 4-023-03 gives a prescribed tensile force capacity that must be achieved based on a percentage of the gravity load seen by the tributary area between each tie. check for capacity requirements for internal ties, peripheral ties, external column ties, etc. thanks, it also says that you can use the floor system already in place to resist these tie forces. so for a composite slab on metal deck, it says that you can use the composite beams as long as they can undergo a rotation of 0.2 rad + the tensile tie force. i'm just wondering how to design a i assume you're looking at the version that just came out a couple of weeks ago? .2 radians is 11.5 degrees. a really big rotation. you're not going to get any bolted connection to work. they're trying to push you to using the reinforcing in the slab as the ties, as you stated. look at figure d-4 on page 123. the days of using your primary structural elements as ties are over. i wasn't aware that the newest version had already been released. i attended a seminar concerning the new version and the intent was that the structural steel framework was not eligible to be utilized as ties anymore. as gumpmaster mentioned, the required rotation is not feasible with steel connections. reinforcement in the slab is the best bet. thanks gumpmasterflex. that's what i needed to hear. i've attached the new version that i've been working off of. it does state in section 3-1.3.1 that you can use the structural all ufc's are available for free from the following web site: __________________ 借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心! [url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]