查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-16, 11:22 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 wood trusses as concmas wall out-of-plane anchorage

wood trusses as conc/mas wall out-of-plane anchorage
my question is regarding the use of wood trusses as out-of-plane wall anchorage for concrete and masonry walls.
the problem arises when i read section 1633.2.8.1, paragraph 5, of the 2001 cbc. it clearly states in this section that when using a wood member, in conjunction with a flexible diaphragm (wood trusses with plywood sheathing), in seismic zones 3 and 4, the wood member shall have a minimum actual net thickness of 2 1/2". this mandates the use of a 3x truss. most every contractor and every truss manufacture that bids this combination of trusses and cmu walls, states that the 3x trusses are not needed and are out of the ordinary.
questions: am i reading this correctly? is there an "out" somewhere in the wood chapter, chapter 23, that i am not aware of? what is everyone else out there doing when using wood trusses to anchor wall-out-of plane forces from concrete and masonry walls?
a prompt reply will be appreciated. thank you.
the section you refer to states that "wood elements of the wall anchorage system" shall have a 2.5" min thickness. i interpret this as requiring a 3x plate at cmu walls supported by a wood diaphragm. this is not at all unusual in california.
otherwise, if you keep expanding your definition of "wall anchorage system", you will end up with a 2.5" thick timber diaphragm...
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)