几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 查看单个帖子

http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread....d=257385&page=1
fsincox (Aerospace)23 Oct 09 16:35
Gentlemen,
I am curious if the interpretation of the ASME Y14.5 standard is the same for all others but me on the issue of Features of Size (ASME Y15.4-1.3.17, 1992). I had never interpreted the "or a set of two opposed elements or opposed parallel surfaces". To mean the surfaces had to be "directly" opposed, so to speak. This is the way one of the big names teaches it. I also know there is dissent among the ranks on various issues in the standard. I just wondered what others think. Say something like this:

__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]

2009-11-25, 09:48 PM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	Features Of Size Question http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread....d=257385&page=1 fsincox (Aerospace)23 Oct 09 16:35 Gentlemen, I am curious if the interpretation of the ASME Y14.5 standard is the same for all others but me on the issue of Features of Size (ASME Y15.4-1.3.17, 1992). I had never interpreted the "or a set of two opposed elements or opposed parallel surfaces". To mean the surfaces had to be "directly" opposed, so to speak. This is the way one of the big names teaches it. I also know there is dissent among the ranks on various issues in the standard. I just wondered what others think. Say something like this: __________________ 借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心! [url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]