几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » American standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-04-29, 06:41 PM   #1
yang686526
高级会员
 
注册日期: 06-11
帖子: 14579
精华: 1
现金: 224494 标准币
资产: 234494 标准币
yang686526 向着好的方向发展
默认 【转帖】bidirectional tol. vs 2 single segment feature control frame

bidirectional tol. vs 2 single segment feature control frame
can anyone explain the difference between controlling the position of an fos with a bi-directional tolerance vs. a 2 single segment feature control frame (non-diametric)? both indicate direction and magnitude relative to specific datums. what are the benefits of one method over the other?
find a job or post a job opening
on slot bi-directional are beneficial since there is usually more tolerance on the length of the slot than the width. if you have a positional tolerance in mmc, one must state "boundary" below each feature control frame.
one will have a fcf reflecting the length and one reflecting the width.
a single segment fcf is altogether different. the top section or 1st level reflects the position of the pattern relative to the datums such as a, b and c. the secondary or lower level fcf reflects inside the pattern. the lower section may only reflect datum a and b. datum a usually relates to orientation (perpendicularity) while datum b is dimenioned and oriented to that datum.
hope this helps.
dave d.
i believe the benefit would be that the feature control frame in y14.5 is covered in the standard as far as the interpretation of the origin and precedence of datums applied. the bi-directional method, is not clearly defined by the standard in this regard. therefore, there is more room for mis-interpretation using bi directional.
i hope that i understood your question. i think i did.
if i am understanding your question correctly, then the answer would be that:
(1) a bi-directional tolerance provides an equal tolerance zone in two directions (wrt the datums) from the basic position of the fos
(2) two single-segment positional tolerance fcfs specify a different tolerance in each of the two directions (wrt the datums) from the basic position of the fos
here's a couple of scenarios;
(1) a tapped hole in a plate must align with a square or circular clearance hole in another plate so that the fastener can move equally in any direction from the basic position; equal bi-directional tolerance would be suitable here
(2) a tapped hole in a plate mates up with a slotted hole in another plate so that the two plates can only move in one direction wrt each other; you would want a looser tolerance in the direction of the slot, but tighter perpendicular to the direction of the slot
jim sykes, p.eng, gdtp-s
profile services
cad-documentation-gd&t-product development
yang686526离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】2 single segment fcf to make rectangular tolerance zone yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:16 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:44 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多