几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » American standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-04-29, 06:56 PM   #1
yang686526
高级会员
 
注册日期: 06-11
帖子: 14579
精华: 1
现金: 224494 标准币
资产: 234494 标准币
yang686526 向着好的方向发展
默认 【转帖】circularity tolerance 9out of round condition0

circularity tolerance (out of round condition)
if there is not a "circularity" requirement on the the drawing then is there an "assumed" circularity tolerance on any given diameter. i.e. a percentage of the nominal size?
the entire surface has to fall between the upper and lower diameter tolerance.
so if your tolerance on diameter is +-.001 you have reasonable circularity.
if +- .010 not so good.
nothing based on % as far as i know.
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
i agree with kinat that the entire feature must not fall outside the tolerance zone. again, this is differences in diameter and not circularity which is a surface condition.
there is no assume percentage for circularity.
dave d.
with the y14.5m-1994 note on a drawing the part must be perfect form at mmc.
bradley
solidworks premim 2007 x64 sp4.0
pdm works, dell xps intel(r) pentium(r) d cpu
3.00 ghz, 5 gb ram, virtual memory 12577 mb, nvidia 3400
if nothing is noted on the dwg, the machinst can do as he/she pleases, but machine it round as the dwg indicates.
chris
solidworks 07 4.0/pdmworks 07
autocad 06
further to bradley's reply, perfect form is required at mmc. this is a consequence of rule #1 (otherwise known as the envelope rule) in which a size tolerance requires that the feature not violate an imaginary boundary of perfect form at mmc. for example, if a hole has a size tolerance of 1.000 +/- .010, its surface must not violate a perfect cylinder of diameter .990 (represented by a .990 gage pin being able to pass completely through). thus if the hole's cross-sectional diameter is .990, its form characteristics (circularity, surface line straightness, derived median straightness, cylindricity) must be perfect in order for the gage pin to pass through. if the hole's cross-sectional diameter is larger than .990 (say .995), its form characteristics can be out by as much as .005. at the lmc diameter of 1.010, the form characteristics can be out by as much as .020 (the size tolerance).
back to the original question, a diameter tolerance gives an equal control over circularity. a diameter tolerance of +/- .010 would limit the circularity error to .020 at worst. there is no assumed relationship between circularity and the nominal diameter.
evan janeshewski
axymetrix quality engineering inc.
bryjarmoc,
a +/- tolerance on a diameter creates limits which must contain whatever form gets fabricated. if the diameter is 50+/-0.1mm, the as-fabricated form must be contained within two concentric circles of 49.9mm and 50.1mm. you also need a location tolerance to set the position of the centre of the round feature.
see asme y14.5m-1994, section 2.7.1. this is rule #1, as noted above.
jhg
further to drawoh's reply, the circularity error is the radial distance between two concentric circles. that takes to a interesting fact: if your part was fabricated with an oval shape, then the maximum circularity error is half of the diameter tolerance !!!
for another shapes is possible a circularity error until the diameter tolerance, as explained in the following link:
thank you for everyone's input. i assumed there was not a circular requirement (if not called out). our inspection department will measure a diameter and even though the min/max of the circle size is with in the diameter tolerance they will state there is a "out of round condition". before i voiced my opinion, i wanted to ensure i was not missing something.
thanks again.
i'm curious as to why your inspection department would state an out of round condition on an inspection report if circularity is not even specified. if the diameter of a feature of size is 1.000 +/-.005 then the diameter can vary from .995 to 1.005 and be good. if the part does in fact vary that much, so what? what is the purpose of going out of the way to state that the part is out of round when it isn't specified on the print? what if the part measured 1.000 to 1.0001; would they state that it was out of round then? according to their policy, they should. what is the threshold before they decide that something is either round or out of round?
powerhound
production supervisor
inventor 2008
mastercam x2
smartcam 11.1
ssg, u.s. army
taji, iraq oif ii
yang686526离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】capability studies on positional tolerances 9rfs0 yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:48 PM
【转帖】calculating positional tolerance yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:43 PM
【转帖】bi-directional top yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:40 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:47 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多