几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » American standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-04-29, 07:40 PM   #1
yang686526
高级会员
 
注册日期: 06-11
帖子: 14579
精华: 1
现金: 224494 标准币
资产: 234494 标准币
yang686526 向着好的方向发展
默认 【转帖】drafting of complex pipes

drafting of complex pipes
i am trying to dimention pipes that are to be bent on a cnc bender and have troubles getting the true angle of the bend. to get the true angle you need both legs of the bend on the plane of the paper. if the pipe has multiple complex bends then is is very dificult to get both legs on the plane. from the 3d software i can create a plane using the centerline vectors of the bend and then place a view using the created plane. but i am finding this method to have a lot of resistance from the checker because i cannot explane the orientation of the view from the standard views. is there a drafting standard for this type of problem, can i place a view that has no easy tracability to the standard 3 views? what is the preferd method of drafing compex pipe/tube shapes?
add a bend table to the drawing with point coordinates of each bend.
chris
solidworks/pdmworks 08 1.1
autocad 06
there is already an xyz coordinate system on the draft for the cnc bender, but this doesn't help the guy who has to inspect the pipe. i want to put down the dimension that he can measure with out getting out his calculator.
???
while it may take much thought, properly defining view orientation is important if the part is to be defined on paper. it may take three or four projections to get a single view to dimension, and many drawing sheets to completely define the part.
think what drafters went through when descriptive geometry was the only way to accomplish this and count your blessings.
i realize that this isn't what you wanted, but have patience and think it out.
believe it if you need it or leave it if you dare.fff"> - robert hunter
i used to work in a shop that did complex marine exhaust pipes with short radii and double walls. we dimensioned the location of both ends of each elbow or tube in regular coordinates, and put the included angle and radius of the elbows in the bill of materials.
this would not be of use to anyone programming a tube bender, but our radii were too short to bend anyway, and it worked okay for inspection.
mike halloran
pembroke pines, fl, usa
look at the example here:
check out this book, specifically page 42.
thank you for the comments so far, they have helped a lot. is there any way to place a view on a drawing that is not a projection or auxillary view of an exsisting view? can i defign or name the view so the reader knows where it comes from, or do all views have to have visual orientation to a standard 3-view?
at this point, i think you and the checker have to agree on just exactly who is going to be reading the drawing and for what reason.
mike halloran
pembroke pines, fl, usa
what you can and can't do with your cad program should be asked in the appropriate forum, since its not related to drafting in general.
"art without engineering is dreaming; engineering without art is calculating."
this is not a cad capability question but rather a drafting standard question.
yang686526离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】complex datum schemes for non-rigid parts yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:00 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:02 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多