几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » American standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-04-29, 08:41 PM   #1
yang686526
高级会员
 
注册日期: 06-11
帖子: 14579
精华: 1
现金: 224494 标准币
资产: 234494 标准币
yang686526 向着好的方向发展
默认 【转帖】limit tolerance text placemen

limit tolerance text placement
howdy all,
i have a question about how limit tolerance type dimensions should be written. i have some old drawings with diameter dimensions to the inside of a machined surface and diameter dimensions to the outside of machined surfaces.
-when displaying a dimension for the inside diameter of a surface the smaller number is on top. example 9.995/10.005
-when displaying a dimension for the outside diameter of a surface the larger number is on top. example 10.005/9.995
the purpose seems to be:
1) when a machinist is machining an inside surface the first number he will machine too is the smaller number – so the smaller number is on top or first.
2) when a machinist is machining an outside surface the first number he will machine too is the larger number – so the larger is on top or first.
i've always put the larger number on top regardless of inside or outside machining, but can't explain way .
my question is – is this practice part of any current (or past) written "standard" that can be quoted from? ansi, asme, iso, global anything?
if not - is there something in any of the drafting standards that defines the placement of the smaller and larger numbers when using limit tolerance type dimensioning?
thanks
tobin sparks
asme y14.5m-1994 section 2.2 (& figure 2-1)addresses this. high limit is placed above the low limit.
not sure about historical use though.
kenat,
back in the day of hand drawings & each company having it's own drawing standards, i worked for a british company that followed that practice. i don't think it is part of any current (inter)national standard.
iso 406:1987 section 5 says:
the upper deviation or the upper limit of size shall be written in the upper position and the lower deviation or the lower limit of size in the lower position, irrespective of whether a hole or a shaft is toleranced.
kenat and dgallup
thank you for your responses. both asme and iso agree and now i know why i have been putting the larger number on top all along .
thanks again
tobin sparks
yang686526离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】capability studies on positional tolerances 9rfs0 yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:48 PM
【转帖】calculating positional tolerance yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:43 PM
【转帖】custom properties for multiple part configurations yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-13 10:08 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:07 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多