几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-04, 04:43 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 asme - where to star

asme - where to start?
hi, i am interested in learning asme gd&t standards and obtaining a certification. what is the best and most efficient way of achieving this?
any advice from people who have attained their certification would be highly appreciated.
find a job or post a job opening
i would check with any local community colleges. also, check with technical consultants inc
asme has a "conference" once or twice a year. this is to take the class and the test and get certified. i don't have the direct link or information, i just know that 2 of my coworkers are going next week or first week of december.
tec-ease (
i would suggest that you get trained through someone who is a gd & t professional and i don't believe that the trainers in all colleges are certified. also get someone who knows how each symbol is measured and the standard does not reflect this.
i have attached the web site that goes directly in asme so that you might find a suitable trainer.
i think that this should help.
dave d.
dave raises an excellent point; don't assume you're instructor is qualified in gd&t just because they're teaching it. i've seen many college and "professional" instructors that aren't certified by asme as gdtp or gdtp-s, and that leads to bad information.
one other point, you need to have 5 years of experience in gd&t before you can get certified. if you haven't had any training yet, get started...it's a steep learning curve.
jim sykes, p.eng, gdtp-s
profile services
cad-documentation-gd&t-product development
relative to this discussion, i took the test a year ago and failed with a 73. i studied for months prior to the test using the body of knowledge as a guide and i really thought i was ready. i was deeply disappointed to discover that a large amount of the test was based on verbatim memorization of certain sections and things that i thought were inconsequential such as whether the datum "sucker" attached to the lower left or upper right. it seems that roughly half the test was actual practical application of gd&t and the rest was filler material. i spent way too much time trying to nail down the function of gd&t and not enough time on the minutiae that i didn't think mattered in the grand scheme of things. i re
the test definitely focuses on the theory and concepts, with little in the way of applications. from what i've seen in industry and what i've heard from veteran gd&t'ers, people hit a perception wall as soon as they see an application from outside of their specialty (e.g. a machinist may not know anything about bearings, and blanks out because of it). as i recall, the failure rate's over 80% of those writing the senior-level exam.
while i empathize that many of the questions seem inconsequential to the "real world", keep in mind that those subtleties are important and the successful completion means a combination of practical and theoretical knowledge. i've worked with and debated with a number of veteran gd&t'ers, and mostly they are correct; the differences often come in the subtleties and the extension of principles that you get from knowing the standard.
jim sykes, p.eng, gdtp-s
profile services
cad-documentation-gd&t-product development
yes the amse gd & t test is pure theory and there is a high play upon words. yes there was very little practical application and absolutely nothing about measurement analysis just imaginary lines around planes, etc.
i needed the certification since i train in the subjecct so i wrote the technologist level first, passed it and finally the senior.
powerhound - work on it. i went through the standard until i couldn't look at it any more and i after i wrote the exam, my brain was fried
good luck.
dave
dave, looking back from the senior level perspective, was there value for you in writing the technologist level first? i.e. did it help you significantly in preparing for the senior level body of knowledge? i recall a bit of overlap, but the bok for the senior level was far more extensive and in-depth.
keep at it, powerhound. i studied my butt off for the exam for a couple months, and did a number of practice exams too. good luck.
jim sykes, p.eng, gdtp-s
profile services
cad-documentation-gd&t-product development
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】asmeb107.100-2002-b94.9-1999标准 huangyhg American standards 1 2009-09-01 09:28 AM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】asme y14.5m application and general drafting stds yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:30 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 0 2009-04-26 02:31 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:42 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多