几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-04, 05:08 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 calling out 00 threads on drawing

calling out #00 threads on drawing
i’m checking a drawing that has #00 threads. (i realize unm threads are usually preferred but this part is mating with existing components.)
what is the correct way to call this out on the drawing, specifically what thread spec should i specify/reference?
i know a lot of people don’t reference the spec on drawings but y14.6 recommends doing so (section 3.2) and normally we reference b1.1, b1.10m or b1.13m as appropriate.
if i understand correctly the thread form is same as unified so should i specify it as an equivalent uns or specify the threads as american national thread form?
also at the moment the callouts say #00-96-2b or #00-90-2b but from the below link i understand the thread class would normally be 3b.
wow, you are almost in the turf where you are spec'ing your own threads. you might need to be very specific, especially if the old american national standard wasn't specific.
there a methods used in un threads that if employed may allow the threads to follow the standard even if they are not mentioned in the standard. i don't have access to the thread standards, so i can't check to see how thread forms are calculated (other than generalities coverd in the machinery's handbook)
matt
cad engineer/ecn analyst
silicon valley, ca
that's the uns i referred to, s stands for special (asme b1.1 -2003 section 6.4 especially). i'm depressingly familiar with special threads to un form as we use them a lot on our fine adjusting screws.
.75x40, .25x80 & 100 etc.
the link i gave above has a calculator for uns threads which seems pretty accurate from the time we verified it.
my concern is if i spec them as .047-90 (or 96) uns will this just confuse the vendor. also if the standard taps are for a class 3 then i'd probably want to specify class 3.
one thought was to spec as uns with #00 in brackets for reference but i'm still not sure about even putting uns in this case.
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
promoting, selling, recruiting and student posting
are not allowed in the forums.
(add stickiness to your site by linking to this professionally managed technical forum)
title: drafting standards,
description: drafting standards, gd&t & tolerance analysis technical support forum and mutual help system for engineering professionals. selling and recruiting forbidden.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】value of drawing check yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 11:08 AM
【转帖】drawing number system - do you still indicate dwg sie in the yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:45 PM
【转帖】decimal dimensioningfractional equivalents yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】calling out 00 threads on drawing yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:44 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:35 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多