几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 10:31 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 drawing reqs molded parts

drawing reqs: molded parts
the manufacturing company i work for builds equipment out of 80% sheet metal components, 20% machined components. we are updating some of our product lines, and are starting to incorporate molded parts. my (broad) question centers on what drawing requirements are needed to receive components as specified on the drawing?
for example, do i need to specify the parting line if its non-critical? shouldn't i leave this up to the vendor?
do i cover the major draft angle in a general note, and dimensionally specify other draft angles that deviate from the note?
any opinions and help welcomed.
art without engineering is dreaming; engineering without art is calculating.
don't specify a parting line unless it's a design feature; it hardly ever really is, and a clever molder may not put it anywhere near where you expect it to be.
don't specify any draft at all on the first issue of the drawing. take a print to your molding partner and go over it with him in some detail. work from his markups for the first revision.
especially for low production volumes, there are mold systems that work better with zero draft, so don't just assume you need it.
when you have mutually agreed on how much draft you need, and in which direction it tapers, make sure the drawing is unambiguous. exaggerate the taper for effect if you need to. better; dimension both ends and the angle.
do not be real quick to change molders. they all do things differently, so you can't just rip a mold out of one guy's machine and install it on another guy's machine and get good parts. the new molder will almost always insist on design changes to adapt the part to his way of doing and thinking. factor substantial mold change costs into any decision about moving a mold. lots of standard contracts assert ownership of the mold, but they're largely a waste of time, because molders don't interchange. did i mention you need to develop a close relationship with one or few molders?
always mold a part number, revision level, and a date code in a part, and a cavity identifier for multiple cavities. always start with one cavity and work up.
it's good to have a talented molder, but a design that wins a prize for the molder is hardly ever a winner for the customer. the best molder can help you arrive at a design that makes his life easy, and fulfills your requirements to make your life easy.
stay away from high performance resins unless you really, really, really need them. most are hideously expensive, sensitive to process control and therefore subject to mysterious rashes of field failures when the process changes, and some physically erode or corrode the molding machine. having to buy a new molding screw for every run of parts you buy can get expensive. ask up front about stuff like that when making material choices.
mike halloran
pembroke pines, fl, usa
work in 3d.
mm,
do you intend to have a vendor create the mold and do the molding for you? or, are you going to design the mold and pour the mold? i'm not clear.
if the vendor is doing everything, just send them the 3d part and let them at it.
if you are doing the design, you can send a vendor a dwg to check. i have done this before. most are nice enough to help out.
chris
solidworks 06 5.1/pdmworks 06
autocad 06
thanks for your input mike. we have done basic molding before, but usually related to taking simple delrin machined parts (spacers, bushings, etc) and converting them over to injection molding for lower part costs.
we have also done thermo forming or vacuum forming, and rotational modling for simple covers, drainage trays, and close-out panels. now we are looking into injection molding, and i assume its an entirely different beast as far as drawing requirements are concerned.
ajack1, yes, 3d is the way to go. i have been communicating with our vendors via pdf drawings and parasolid models. so far, so good.
are there any "standard" notes that i should be using on drawings? are there standard notes related to how much flash is acceptable and how it should be trimed? are there standards for surface textures? can anyone recommend published standards or specifications that i should be investing in?
art without engineering is dreaming; engineering without art is calculating.
these are typical notes for molds we build both in house and out of house.
note: unless otherwise specified.
material: molded from transparent polycarbonate pantone color 2728c. color must match existing xxxxxxx parts.
finish: interior surfaces to have a spi/spe #3 finish.
exterior surfaces to have a mold-tech #11010 finish.
external features draft to be 2<mod-deg>.
(-) = draft subtracts from dimension.
(+) = draft adds to dimension.
internal features draft to be 1<mod-deg>.
(-) = draft subtracts from dimension.
(+) = draft adds to dimension.
ejector and gate locations subject to approval
by xxxxxxx engineering department.
best regards,
heckler
sr. mechanical engineer
swx 2007 sp 2.0 & pro/e 2001
dell precision 370
p4 3.6 ghz, 1gb ram
xp pro sp2.0
nvidia quadro fx 1400
o
_`\(,_
(_)/ (_)
(in reference to david beckham) "he can't kick with his left foot, he can't tackle, he can't head the ball and he doesn't score many goals. apart from that, he's all right." -- george best
some links:
heckler, i think that is what i was looking for. thanks. what does "spi/spe" stand for?
ctopher, we are creating the design, but the molders are making all tooling. our vendors are sophisticated enough to only need the model, but i still need to generate decent 2d drawings to capture the design and give our qa department something to do and use for fai. i will check your provided links as well.
art without engineering is dreaming; engineering without art is calculating.
spi/spe
society of the plastics industry / society of plastics engineers
or some such nonsense. you can get sample plaques from spi / spe which have examples of different surface finishes you can specify on an injection mold/molded part. i don't recall exactly what they are, but the a series are the most highly polished, if i recall correctly.
for more examples of surface finish and different injection molded part design guidelines, i'd recommend going to
mm,
spi - the society of the plastics industry. these are guides of typical surface finishes which aid in the communication of what is expected from the mold maker. sometimes we will just call out a light edm finish if the part is not critical in appearance. the mold-tech is another surface texture specification.
best regards,
heckler
sr. mechanical engineer
swx 2007 sp 2.0 & pro/e 2001
dell precision 370
p4 3.6 ghz, 1gb ram
xp pro sp2.0
nvidia quadro fx 1400
o
_`\(,_
(_)/ (_)
(in reference to david beckham) "he can't kick with his left foot, he can't tackle, he can't head the ball and he doesn't score many goals. apart from that, he's all right." -- george best
promoting, selling, recruiting and student posting
are not allowed in the forums.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
drawing number system - do you still indicate dwg sie in the huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 10:30 AM
【转帖】what should appear on a drawing parts lis yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 11:18 AM
【转帖】value of drawing check yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 11:08 AM
【转帖】drawing number system - do you still indicate dwg sie in the yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:45 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:31 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多