几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 01:03 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 standard clearances

standard clearances
i'm a designer for the deep draw stamping industry. one question going around is about clearance between two mating parts. we typically design in fit at assembly. the tooling is typically designed at .001" - .0015" clearance depending on the application. our fit dia's can run anywhere from .25" up to 5" in dia.
to get to the question i'm trying to ask..
at what point do you increase your fit clearance. some people around here are saying .001" per inch clearance, others are saying .0005" per inch. we just built some tooling to where the fit dia's where over 6" dia. they designed in the normal clearance and now there working them in. (better than to much clearance) my experiencing saying .0005" per inch but i want to know what other brilliant engineering people think.
solid edge v20
cadman1964,
take the case that you have two parts located together by some datum features.
if you have a fixed feature on part a that must pass through a hole in part b, your positional tolerance must be one half the minimum clearance. if both both parts have a hole that a third feature must pass through, then the positional tolerances must be equal to the minimum clearance.
in other words, there is a relationship between your positional tolerances and your clearances. how accurately do you want to position stuff, and what maximum clearance can you tolerate?
jhg
sounds like an industry specific question more than a general dimensioning/tolerancing question. there might be other fora that are more likely to have others from your industry in them.
like drawoh says, from a point of view of parts fitting together in an assy you can work it out on worst case fit or some statistical bases. however, i'm not sure this is what you're asking about.
kenat,
yea youre most likely right, should maybe found a different forum for this. but anyways, i did find what i was looking for in the machinerys hand book.
solid edge v20
promoting, selling, recruiting and student posting
are not allowed in the forums.
(add stickiness to your site by linking to this professionally managed technical forum)
title: drafting standards,
description: drafting standards, gd&t & tolerance analysis technical support forum and mutual help system for engineering professionals. selling and recruiting forbidden.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
datum reference style old new on y14.5m standard drawing huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:44 PM
【转帖】asmeb107.100-2002-b94.9-1999标准 huangyhg American standards 1 2009-09-01 09:28 AM
【转帖】what are the guidelines to create a new standard yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 11:13 AM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 0 2009-04-26 02:31 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:11 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多