几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 09:58 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 aci moment magnification factor for nonsway frames

aci moment magnification factor for nonsway frames
the moment magnification factor for nonsway frames equals
cm/[1-pu/(0.75pc)]
which is equation 10-9 in aci 318-02.
as the column gets longer, the critical load pc gets smaller, and the factor approaches infinity as 0.75pc approaches pu.
my question is, what happens if pu > 0.75pc?
this results in a negative value for the moment magnification factor. is 0.75pc the maximum limit for pu?
the code does not address this, so i am wondering if anyone has any experience with this situation. thanks.
i don't think aci gives explicit guidance, but if you think about, pu can't be greater than 0.75pc. if pu=0.74pc then the moment magnifier becomes almost infinite. that's because as you approach the critical buckling load the lateral displacement just keeps growing and growing which significantly increases second order effects. the factor of safety on this is obviously the 0.75 (for pc) and the load factors (for pu).
thanks structuraleit.
i agree, just looking for some reassurance. a colleague told me that since the moment magnification factor couldn't be less than one, a negative factor should be taken as one. obviously that's not right, but i just wanted some clarification.
so i guess in this case 0.75pc is the real critical load. thanks.
yes, any axial force greater than 0.75 pc would represent an elastic buckling failure of the column.
honestly, this would be true for a sway frame as well. it's just that aci requires you to run a 2nd order analysis (p-delta) which to some extent will end up predicting that failure.
the 2008 aci code has a bit more guidance on using "analysis" to predict 2nd order effect rather than relying on the cm / (1-pu/0.75pc) equation. unfortunately, i don't have this with me right now. so, i cannot comment in detail....other than to tell you to take a look.
josh
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
aci 350-06 required by ibc 06 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:50 AM
aci 318 appendix d huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:42 AM
aci 10.12.3.2 min moment m2--what is the reason huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:37 AM
【转帖】哪位高手指点一下下边lisp的怎么用 yang686526 数据库ObjectDBX 0 2009-04-28 12:13 PM
哪位高手指点一下下边lisp的怎么用 yang686526 ObjectARX(AutoLISP) 0 2009-04-26 06:19 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:47 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多