几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 10:28 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 aisc 13th edition and 2000 ibc

aisc 13th edition and 2000 ibc
if i am providing calculations on steel connections for a project governed by the 2000 ibc, is it acceptable to use the aisc 13th edition? i believe the aisc lrfd 3rd edition is referenced in the 2000 ibc.
val
find a job or post a job opening
i would suggest using the 3rd edition lrfd. although i would think the design would probably wind up the same if you used the 13th edition.
i would say no. the aisc 13th ed. has some (not too many, but some) significant changes, even from the 3rd ed. lrfd. as far as connections go, you are allowed something like 50% greater weld strength for welds loaded perpendicular to the length of the weld. this might affect your weld sizes significantly (causing them to be smaller than would be required by the 3rd ed lrfd).
there is no blanket yes or no answer to the op's question. legally, one must follow the aisc edition formally adopted by reference in the governing building code in a given jurisdiction. however, the use of the latest available information may be used provided that the result is better than or equal to the reference adopted in the current building code.
the 50% increase you mention for a weld loaded perpendicular to its axis has been around since the 2nd edition lrfd.
if you're designing under the ibc 2000, then the 3rd lrfd is the specification to design with. if you want to use the 13th edition, at the very least you'd need the blessing of whoever's reviewing/approving the connection design calculations.
typically, chapter 1 of ibc allows the building official to accept alternative methods of compliance and for less stringent provisions of newer codes not yet adopted, it would be adjudicated to the local appeal board. i have not heard of a board denying a variance for a future code provision that will eventually be adopted.
don phillips
thank you for the replies. i went ahead and designed per the reference standards of the governing building code.
val
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】visual C== 2008 Express Edition yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-07 06:35 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM
下载好多软件 ping CAD资料交换区 6 2007-03-03 09:13 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:07 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多