几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 01:04 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 asce 7-02 wind low rise method

asce 7-02 wind low rise method
hello.
is it correct to use roof angle=0 degrees to determine gcpf for wind parallel to ridge? thanks in advance.
check out our whitepaper library.
no. by definition, a ridge has angle > 0.
ron,
i believe it is correct to use roof angle=0-5 degrees (figure 6-10 p. 56) for determination of gcpf for all wind parallel to ridge. an example p. 59 of the "guide to the use of the wind load provisions of asce 7-02" shows that my thinking is correct. anyone else agrees?
i forgot to mention that the roof is a gable.
figure 6-10 note 7 says to use angle = 0 degrees and also how to locate the boundary between zone 2 and zone 3.
chichuck
chichuck.
yes. that is correct.
do you agree that if i have 2 cp for windward and 2 cp for leeward, i would have 8 load cases?
chichuck,
i forgot to add. the cp for mwfrs all heights method. not low rise method.
structural1,
i'm not sure i understand your question. but here's what i think you mean:
for calculating wind loads on roofs, mwfrs using method 2 (this is not the low-rise method), you can find cp for the roofs in figure 6-6. for some of the windward roofs there are listed two cf coefficients. (sometimes there are two negative cf values, other times there are two negative cf values.) each of these will actually define two separate load cases; one when combined with internal suction and a second when combined with internal prssure. if you have a roof geometry where there are also 2 cf values listed, that would represent two additional load cases (one when combined with internal suctino and a second when combined with internal pressure.) but looking at figure 6.6, i see no case where there are two cf values on leeward roofs. (the cp values in the bottom part of fig. 6-6 (normal to riddge for theta < 10 and paralell to ridge for all theta are only for windward perp to ridge.) so your hypothetical case will never come up. i can see only 4 load cases.
regards,
chichuck
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
asce 7-02 wind load enclosure type opinion huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:04 PM
asce 7 wind speeds 180mph huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:00 PM
asce 7 wind method 1 method 2 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:59 PM
are asce 7-02 wind loads ultimate or service level huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:46 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:02 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多