几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 01:09 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 asce 7-05 out-of-plane seismic forces

asce 7-05 out-of-plane seismic forces
in asce 7-05 section 12.11.1, the out-of-plane forces for structural walls (shear and/or bearing) are 0.4sdsiwp with a minimum of 0.1wp.
these forces are also used for anchoring or bracing the top and bottom of the the wall sections. a minimum anchorage load is given in section 12.11.2.
if a flexible diphragm is used for a c, d or e category building, the anchorage force doubles to 0.8sdsiwp (section 12.11.2.1). the code does not specifically state that the wall should be designed for out-of-plane forces (bending and shear) to this magnitude, only the anchorage.
is this how you read it? do you design the wall reinforcing and thickness for 0.4sdsiwp for all situations unless wind controls?
find a job or post a job opening
i read it the same way, the anchorage is designed for the greater force but not the wall. note also the steel anchorage increase required in 12.11.2.2.2.
"do you design the wall reinforcing and thickness for 0.4sdsiwp for all situations unless wind controls?"
yes
thanks haynewp.
as for out-of-plane wind loads, i use the components & cladding wind load. when the wind blows in this direction, this wall can't normally contribute any shear resistance as a part of the mwfrs. to calculate the effective area for c&c, i use the height h between the support levels to get the area = h*h/3. is this what everyone else does?
if i re
i got h*h/3 from the definitions in 6.2. the other option would be to multiply the height by a strip width of 1 foot, 16" or perhaps the the rebar/grout spacing.
effective wind area, a: the area used to determine gcp. for component and cladding elements, the effective wind area in figs. 6-11 through 6-17 and fig. 6-19 is the span length multiplied by an effective width that need not be less than one third the span length.
right, "need not be less than one third the span length".
basing it on a 1 ft strip x h would be quite conservative. i could also see an argument made for the width being based on the reinforcing spacing.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
asce 17-96 para. 4.2.5 load combinations seiasce 7-02 com huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:54 PM
are asce 7-02 wind loads ultimate or service level huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:46 PM
2003 ibc out-of-plane seismic huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:26 AM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】how to get the name of the reference plane yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-13 11:58 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:16 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多