几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 02:29 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 base shear distribution

base shear distribution
for seismic analysis using equivilent force method per ibc, the base shear is distributed vertically using equations involving the weight at each floor x the height / sum of the weight x height for all floors. for a single story slab on grade building, this results in 100% of the base shear being applied at the roof level. however, i have seen published design examples where the lateral force applied at the roof level is the weight of the roof + 1/2 the weight of the walls. which is correct?
if it is a single story flexible diaphragm on shear walls, i take (1/2 the perpendicular walls + roof weight) in designing the roof for seismic.
if it is a single story rigid diaphragm, i think you should take (1/2 the perpendicular walls + 1/2 the parallel walls + the roof weight) when designing the roof diaphragm for seismic.
i have also seen examples that do this differently than i have stated above. i do not design the diaphragm to take the total base shear that includes the weight of the full height of all walls.
similar to haynewp, i (and my office) only use half the wall height (plus parapet if present) for our seismic weight acting at the roof.
agree with haynewp and tngolfer. the reason you do this is that you don't need to consider the weight of the parallel walls because they resist their own shear and the load will never reach the roof diaphragm.
you do need to consider 1/2 the weight of the perpendicular walls because that seismic shear will have to be transferred into the parallel shear walls. the rest goes directly into the foundation.
similar to marcbse, although for a metal stud wall with brick we include the weight of all walls and only ingore the parallel walls if they are concrete or masonry, with the thought being they are rigid enough to resist their own shear, while the metal stud walls wont be.
strguy11-
i assume you are referring only to metal stud walls that are not shear walls? obviously if the exterior walls are sheathed (or strap braced) shear walls they will resist their own shear.
if the exterior walls are not shear walls and all bracing is through braced frames or the like, then i would also include the weight of the parallel walls in the diaphragm shear as strguy11 said. that is assuming the braced frames are not located immediately adjacent to the exterior walls.
correct.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
base shear calculation fron ibc and asce-7 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:29 PM
base plate design ignores corners of base plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:24 PM
base plate anchor rod hole size huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:23 PM
aci shear anchorage question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:00 AM
ransverse shear of plates huangyhg 精密机械 0 2009-09-06 09:34 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:35 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多