几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 05:05 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 bridge construction

bridge construction
we are trying to design a bridge to cross a creek that will support our farm tractor (with wagons containing hay which would weigh in total about 12 ton). the creek is 60 feet bank to bank. what would be the most economical way to span this creek to support the maximum weight?

i would think that you may be able to use a couple of steel beams with a timber deck. perhaps the abutment could be either timber or concrete. you may have to dig a couple of pits to investigate the soils conditions at each abutment.
it would be advisable to hire a structural engineer to design it for you.
best of luck!
jimbo (staff)22 mar 04 16:26
there is a bridge engineering forum on the site. might try there.
buy a dictionary, keep it nearby and use it. webster's new world dictionary of american english is recommended, and webster's collegiate dictionary.
60 feet is a river
a creek is limited unless at an estuary
so if this is an estuary you need a bridge engineer and a stack of piled foundations for soft soils affected by river water inflow and subisdence
lateral stress on foundations is high and the sides may displace and the surface rise
if a creek and not rock it must have low strength soils
the ground must be near saturated at times and if not then the soils will dessicate
no way would a steel girder decking arrangement suffice without some serious abutments and
it might be good to transfer to stress to the sides by using a slight pre-formed arch on good angled piles, but
with tractor weight you are going to risk twisting the structure as the machinery moves the load across so dynamic state has to be considered and this is where most bridges and culverts begin to founder and at best you end up with a subsided unusuable mass if steel and wood. is there a shorter way around i.e. cheaper by going around some existing paved zone ?
it could be a lot of expense for very little result and much eroded foundered muck 'n 'ay
possibly your life under an unstable tractor frame
sincerely
mikehydrophys
mdshydroplane
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
bridge collapse huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:04 PM
bridge collapse in mn part 2 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:04 PM
bridge basics huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:02 PM
bridge abutment design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:02 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:16 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多