几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 05:47 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 built up section

built up section
i've been designing a built up section with a channel welded to the top of a wide flange shape to help take some lateral load. i was directed to use the asd 9th to find allowable stresses and compare that to the elastic section modulus (i was happy to see the same procedure being used in this thread:
i think the only concern is the channel-beam connection, which could cost a lot. what are the loads on the beam? is there anything that you can provide tie-backs? have you explored using shapes with stronger weak axix properties?
the beam is for a movable overhead crane so there would be no way to brace it midspan. 36'-0" unbraced length, asd worst case in combination is 146 ft-kips vertical and 30 ft-kips lateral. i started looking at standard sections that would be able to carry this but i was directed to use the configuration i mentioned above.
here ya go:
chipb: excellent link.
thanks, thats a heck of a lot better than the spreadsheet i made based on the same design guide 7.
146 kips veritical and 30 kips lateral might put you in the realm of fabricated plate girders or plate box girders. on several occasions when i've estimated heavily loaded crane runway beams, plate box girders came out a bit more economical than w40's with c18 cap channels. i have not looked in to fabricated single web plate girders, but this might be of interst.
the crane builder can most likely provide pricing of plate box girders for you.
one more note:
crane beam v1.1 is a great tool.
i wish every a&e firm would use it when preparing dwgs for a project. all to often, the a&e firm calls out a crane runway beam 2 or 3 times the size that is needed. the problem is worst with wwtp facility designers. thats our tax $$ being wasted.
moreover, when we bid the job, we ask ourselves, should we bid the smaller beam that we know will work (and take the risk that the a&e will not accept our submitted size) or bid what is specified by the a&e (and lose the job to the guys how took the risk)
best solution: call out the runways beams to be sized and provided by crane builder - and have the beam provider submit calcs at submittal stage of project.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
built up section modeling huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:47 PM
built up section - sction modulus huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:46 PM
section of a section huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 12:48 PM
【转帖】section of a section yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:53 PM
Ug术语中英对照表cad部分 topology UG二次开发 1 2007-02-13 11:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:21 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多