几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 11:48 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 circular tie details for drilled piers

circular tie details for drilled piers
i have two concerns about the circular ties (#6) for my drilled piers (for river embankment stabilization, under mostly large bending and shear, minimum axial, 36"dia, 24#11 with #6 ties @ 3"-4" spa)
1. the lap length - is 48 db sufficient (36" as lap length)?
2. the lap details - should the lap steel be overlaping with the circular tie or turning into the interior of the cross section(seems to be preferred by fhwa)? if the lap is 48db (36") there is barely enough room for the lap. what about the constructibility?
thanks for the help!
use spiral ties.
ols ca se
is there a reason you need #6 ties? usually #3 or #4 are used.
also, if the member is taking mostly bending and shear, it's classified as a tension controlled
shear (500 kips factored)is too high for spirals - size of spirals are limited to #5 unless you go with special heavy equipment. i can not size up the shaft either. it seems the only option is #6 ties.
if the direction of the shear can be predicted, can you use smaller ties and add #6 or #7's spanning across the interior of the piers (parallel to the load direction)? they'll be tough to install, but there should be room to get the mud in.
also increase f'c?

fc'is 4000psi. anything above that will have special requirement by aci318.
these shafts are one of the many sections of shafts along the river emankment. the clients wanted use same diameter shafts (36") and similar details....same strength of concrete...therefore to cut their cost. they claimed that #6 ties have been used in another section. although #6 circular ties may be out of the ordinary but will it be a solution? i am mostly interested in the details of it......
thanks!
khkw
i'd use #4 circular ties but then add rectangular #5 or #6 per jedclampett's suggestion above if the load is of a known direction. you could create a rectangular rebar cage within the circular cage to fit together - and perhaps do this only in the top portions of the pier.
getting the concrete down the shaft might be an issue (as jed suggested above). one thought would be to fill the pier up to a point and then drop in an internal rectangular cage, tie it off to the cirular cage and then continue with the concrete placement.
but tying it all together at the start is preferred.

i would stick with the circular #6 ties if you can't get #6 made into a spiral. but as for the laps, that is not the way to go. you should be able to bend the ends of the ties 135 degrees around alternate bars; that is, one vertical bar space between the bends. just check with a reinforcing supplier in your area about bending these ties, but i have seen it done where i am.
thanks for all your responses! jedclampett and jae both have very good points. but i think introducing #6 or #7's spanning across the interior of the piers might jack up the cost more than they wanted. hokie66's idea is refreshing but how do you achieve the splice length (36") with 135 degree between bends. also by doing this it will create honey cones in the space between the splice and the ties - an issue for concrete to get thru......
perhaps my post was confusing. the ties are made continuous by 135 degree hooks at each end rather than by splice length. these hooks are not around the same vertical bar, but rather around alternate bars, which allows space for the vertical bars and avoids the type of congestion that may cause honeycombing. also, the location of the tie terminations should be varied around the perimeter of the pier.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
circular conc. tanks huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:42 PM
belled piers huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:21 PM
background of strut and tie method huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:08 PM
【转帖】circularity vs circular runou yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:56 PM
【转帖】circular runou yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:55 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:44 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多