几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 07:34 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 drag force on rigid diaphragm

drag force on rigid diaphragm
i am working on a single story masonry building with concrete roof(see attached sketch) . i am wondering do i need to consider drag force when design the roof (e.g. for wall 3).
you have nothing to drag. distribute the horizontal load and corresponding torsion on the bearing walls (ignore partitions) per wall rigidity. do it for each direction.
yes, but if the interior walls are similar in construction to the exterior walls, and they are also attached to the roof, then they will collect lateral forces.
if the force transferred from the diaphragm to the wall 3 can be connected within the length of wall 3, then technically a collector/drag strut isn't needed. i might add additional reinforcing in the roof diaphragm along wall 3 just in case.

the reason to ignore the partition walls is because there lies high possibility the interior space would be altered in the future, thus create difficulty by then. yes, the ignored walls inevitably will share the loads, but the method is conservative, shouldn't have much impact on their's strength and performance.
"yes, the ignored walls inevitably will share the loads"
it is true and must be accounted for in design unless a means to prevent force transfer to these walls is made.
"it is true and must be accounted for in design unless a means to prevent force transfer to these walls is made."
if you don't make such provision (for partitions - non bearing) in your design, the trouble is down the road. the wall colud be removed entirely without replacement for space recongiguration/re-utilization purposes . now which
one more noe:
not all interior walls are automatically labelled "partitions", it is up to your design. so, it's good practice to label the bearing walls on the drawings.
the reason i use wall 3 and 4 as shear wall is because wall 2 and wall 6 have too much openings and wall 3 and wall 4 are solid.
jae, if i add additional rebars for drag force, where should i add them, just the stripe of the roof aligned with wall 3 or 4 with the width of the wall? do i need add stir up since the drag force could be compression?
i would add them to either side of the opening and extend them parallel to wall 3 for at least half the wall length. no need to curve them into wall 3 itself - just get them into the area of the diaphragm to either side of wall 3. the slab will do the rest.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
what mike said....
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
diaphragm design with openings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:37 PM
chord force in a concrete filled diaphragm huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:37 PM
chord force adjacent to cmu wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:37 PM
can a u shaped flexible even stan up huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:20 PM
assuming metal roof deck rigid diaphragm huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:39 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:05 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多