几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 09:51 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 ej sacrificial ledge--opinions please

ej sacrificial ledge--opinions please
the expansion joint thread reminded me of something. i'd like to see what folks here think of "sacrificial ledges."
i've designed buildings with expansion joints from 2" to about 8". some of these are very difficult to sell to architects, especially where they cross corridors.
i was discussing this with a fellow from another firm a while back and he said something like: "why don't you just use a sacrificial ledge?" i'd never heard of one.
say i need a 12" ej, which wouldn't be hard to imagine. the idea would be to keep a 12" gap between the edges of slab except at specific locations such as corridors where there'd be no way to hide the 12" gap by placing it between two partitions.
at corridors, etc., use a very flimsy piece of slab, closing the gap to 2" or whatever. perhaps this could be a very thin piece of composite slab. in a seismic or wind event, this piece of slab might be smashed, but the overall effect on the diaphragms and lfrs would be insignificant.
the first thing that occurred to me was that it might suck to be standing on the sacrificial ledge! would that make one a "sacrificial live load"?
so what say ye? safe? ok idea? just plain stupid? i should lose my pe and se licenses for just asking the question?! lol.
he said his firm used sacrificial ledges very frequently.
does guidance exist for these? i've never heard of it, but then again, i never went looking for it either.
cant say ive ever done this before, but it does make sense.
strength design and serviceability are two separate service levels.
it is a form of risk based seismic design i suppose.
you would need to make this clear to the client that this is what will happen in a semi-extreme event.
you need to put sufficient reinforcement in it to tie it back to the structure and make sure it doesnt fall onto people below.
you still need to allow for enough movement so that the sacrificial ledge wont need replacing every year.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
corbel or ledge huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:59 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:24 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多