几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 10:09 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 embed plates with dba

embed plates with dba
folks,
why is it that not a lot of people use embed plates with dba (deformed bar anchors) and get away from using appendix d, and use embed plates with headed studs.
i would appreciate your inputs.
i actually use rebar welded to embed plates if i can't get headed studs to work out with app. d. i have 4 details in a rather small job i'm working on now that required rebar welded to the embed plate because hca just wouldn't work.
do you know if there is a cost-implication with dba's? i am wondering why even use a headed-stud and have to go through the craziness of appendix d when all you need is a few reinforcing bars well developed. would you mind posting a pdf of your detail?
i think that more people are probably familiar with studs than dba's. i use both!
here's a fairly generic detail i just sketched. i'm not comfortable posting a detail from an actual job. we also have in our general notes that rebar that is to be welded must be astm a706 (i think that's the right designation), and that e90xx electrodes are required. also, the ld should say ldh. there is obviously a lot of detailing left off, but it gets the embed plate with rebar detailing across.
seit:
you didn't post the detail... no link, nothing.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
shoot, my mistake. it's a very simple detail.
i have ysed similar details in the past, but included a small bearing flange at the top to help with the load to the rebar. usually the flange is 1 to 2" long.
however, for whatever reason, the poster has an afterset condition to deal with here which is a totally different animal.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
dba cost a little than hsa, a706 rebar and extra prep. when welding. you can also use threaded rebar again cost is more than hab. appex. d is not bad once you develop rebar to take the breakout.
i still have a trick i want to run by a plan checker, embed a hsa 26". appex. d applies to embed's less than 25" kicking you out of appex d. then i can use old code equations to justify allowable values. lol

have you considered an arrangement like this?
rowingengineer,
we used to use this type of thing all the time for precast industrial buildings in melbourne. the original company that made these did testing on them to verify the calculations.
two things you need to consider. firstly, the mesh needs to be cut to fit the rebar 'handles'. secondly, you should thread a few bars through the 'handles' on the opposite side of the mesh to anchor it in.
we also had our own engineer do some calculations to verify it.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
corrosion of galvanized plates huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:08 PM
cap plates and baseplates huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:48 PM
bt limits huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:24 PM
analyis of embedment plates with headed studs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:33 AM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:18 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多