几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 01:25 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 foundation design - need quick answer

foundation design - need quick answer
this question is probably answerable by someone familar with bridge design, but the arema design manual for train structures indicates that impact loads are not normally considered for foundation design. does that include reinforcement or are they just referring to stability issues (such as bearing pressure and overturning)?

"include reinforcement" = foundation design
"bearing pressure and overturning" = foundation sizing
that's the distinction i'd make- don't know anything about the standard in question, though.
i'm also not familiar with the standard in question, but i am familiar with aashto lrfd bridge design specifications which says (in 3.6.2.1 2nd bullet) the impact factor "need not be applied to foundation components that are entirely below grade level." some state dots clarify that to mean that abutment stems and footings do not get the impact factor but pier caps and shafts do. i realize that i haven't exactly answered your question, but i will note that i know of no standard that makes the distinction of applying the dynamic load allowance to a foundation for one aspect of design but not another. i imagine if this duality were the case with the rail standard that it would explicitly stated. hope that helps.
although i am not entirely familiar with arema, i would interpret their meaning to be for both stability and reinforcing design. as jemh said foundation components entirely below grade are generally designed for factored loads, but impact is typically not considered.
note though that arema does indicate that you do have to consider vibratory effects in your footing design. depending on you structure this could be more a more serious consideration than an increase of the live load by a certain percentage.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
footing foundation design reference huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:03 PM
dots requiring pe stamps on shop drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:18 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
【转帖】decimal dimensioningfractional equivalents yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:30 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多