几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 01:35 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 foundation pour lengths

foundation pour lengths
i've read previous posts about limitations on concrete pour lengths in concrete tanks, but i haven't found anything regarding standard foundations. i have a project under construction using concrete trench footings and standard wall footings. we require construction joints at a maximum spacing of 60'. this has been part of our standard structural notes and we've never had a problem with it before but the contractor says that this limitation throws off their schedule (even though it should've been in his bid) and asked if we could lose this limitation. we told them that we couldn't and that they should leave between 5' and 60' between adjacent pours and wait 7 days between the infill pour and to limit the shrinkage effects.
i just wanted to know if we're being too strict on these limitations and what, if any, others use for the limitations on pour lengths.

check out our whitepaper library.
if these are buried foundation walls, or retaining walls with earth full height or close on one side, i would agree with the contrator.
however, with no earth present to serve as a heat sink and thermal barrier, i would stick to your guns here.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
if the retaining wall (yielding) is exposed to weather on one side and not part of a heated building structure, it will need expansion/contraction joints too.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
the project is multiple buildings, so some are earth formed trench footings, and others are formed footings with stem walls. all will be buried foundations so they're not retaining soil and aren't under any flexural stresses. which part do you feel is too strict? the length or the delay in adjacent pours? we are thinking that we will stick to the 60' length, but allow them to pour adjacent pours the following day as opposed to waiting 7 days.
if there are specific places you want to read the shrinkaqe cracks, then stick to your 60 foot limit, where is where they will show.
however, as a buried trench footing and/or stem wall, and if they are not visible, what's the harm in a monopour of the entire strip footing regardless of length? variations in temperature will not be an issue here, only shrinkage, which can be limited by the amount of water in the mix.
that will be the problem though - the water added to the mix on-site by the cobntractor and truck operator to get it out of the truck quickly. that will add to the shrinkage.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
thanks, i appreciate the help.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
foundation for brick veneer - vertical extension ok huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:31 PM
foundation design for settlemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:27 PM
foundation cracking and settling huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:24 PM
crack in foundation wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:20 PM
connecting a new foundation to an existing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:09 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:41 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多