几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 03:00 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 grain bin evaluation

grain bin evaluation
i have been asked to give my opinion about the structural integrity of an existing 400,000-bushel circular butler metal storage bin.
the structure is about 18 years old (no records) 96 feet in diameter about 60 feet high and set on a circular concrete foundation (unknown design) 100 feet in diameter.
i looked @ the bin and foundation. there are no cracks in the foundation and none of the metal rib siding show any signs of displacement and all bolts are intact and in place.
however when i took elevations on the top of the footing there is about a 5 陆鈥?inch difference in elevation in a100 feet.
questions how concern should i be about the elevation difference and how far do you investigate? this is not a public work project and it has been in use since construction.
how about the top of the wall at both points? are they 5.5" difference also? what type of soil is it?
did not take elevation on top of bin wall, would required
personnel lift.
soils are most likely gw or gp
generally, if you tilt the base of a tank or silo while holding it in a plane, nothing much happens. you develop a bit of a lateral loading that could be treated similar to seismic loading
if the base deflects out of a plane, it can cause problems in the structure itself, which would generally show up as buckles of one sort or another. api-653 includes an evaluation criteria for welded steel (smooth) tanks, but it would not be applicable to a corrugated-type structure.
given that it's an agricultural facility, there's not much telling how the foundation was built, whether a soils report was done, etc. if it doesn't seem to be having problems otherwise, i'd note the settlement, but otherwise not take any action.
it is possible it was built that way, too.
the soil loading when full is near 3.1 ksf. if this is less than the allowable, then a bit of differential settlement,(5" in 100'), should not render the structure unusable for the use that it is experiencing unless there is a head house with augers requiring level placement. even then, shims may be installed for the machinery requirements.
so is it fair to say that the wall is tilted about 3.14 degree (arc tan of 5.5/100) ? since you dont see any cracks on the foundation then i assume the whole structure is tilted 3.14 degree? or is it possible they made and error with the foundation and the wall on one side is taller than the other when they build it? since the foundation is good and the shape is circular, i wouldnt worry about it. just my oppinion.
oopss correction.. .262 degree.. forgot to change it to foot.
perhaps it's sloped on purpose for water drainage? i know you would have bigger problems if you have water in it while full of grain but perhaps there is a need for washdown or some other reason. just a thought.
stroker has a point there. sometimes tanks are built where the shell is vertical but bottom slightly sloped- called a "shovel bottom". with corrugated stuff, you probably wouldn't want to do that, but it might have been tilted intentionally.
it would help to know generally what type of soils are in the area. around here, you don't expect to see that much movement, but i've seen sites that anticipated two or three times as much settlement. if you're in an area where movement is pretty minimal, chances that it was built that way are a lot higher. if it's beside the river or in the swamplands, it could have moved that much.
one quick, easy and unsophisticated way to get an idea if the tank is leaning is to take a 4' carpenter's spirit level, walk around the bin and check to see if the walls are plum at numerous points. plot your results.
not the most accurate check, but if there is a problem it may tell you where to investigate further.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
end grain epoxy gluing of threaded rod into timber pile huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 10:17 PM
【转帖】dwgdirect 1.14.01 now available yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 08:18 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:55 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多