几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 05:01 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 horizontal load on handrail

horizontal load on handrail
the ibc states that a 50 plf be applied to the top rail of the guardrail. in a 3 span condition, i have seen it applied as a uniform load across the entire rail (3 spans) and i have seen it applied for just one span. anybody have a comment on this? i know that a minimum 200 lb concentrated load is applied anywhere along the rail not concurrently with the uniform load.
do it for the worst case.
i can't comment on the amount of load but i would assume it's similar to what we use in the uk. in terms of the design approach, applying the load to a single span will give a more conservative design moment compared to allowing for continiuty over the supports. in the latter case, the mid-span moment reduces and although you'll now get moments at the supports they would never be greater than the moment at the centre of a single span beam (if you have equal loading and equal spans). also in terms of constrcution it is not always practical to have one single rail and therefore the single span design takes account of this possibility.
your bigger question should be what country is the hand rail going to be used in? the worst case loading ranges widely in the world, it will also depend on it usage, will it be used as an anchor point or just a handrail. from what i have read on hand rail australia has one of the highest standers.
chris
"in this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics." homer simpson
i would set up a spreadsheet or simple computer model with all your load cases input (panel load, top handrail load and one large concentrated point load), and make sure all your elements have capacity for these loads. in our office we try to limit our deflections to h/125 which allows us approximatley 10mm deflection and the top of the posts.
we had to retrofit and new handrail to an existing exit platform at a university and had a not-so-great detail where we bolted the handrail posts to the web of a channel section. the client asked us to come and and have a look at it because in there opinion it "flexed" a little. we went out and gave it a shake and i didn't think it was moving to far.
i can't upload the video, the size must be to large. i will just post a photo instead, the job is in australia.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
forklift load on structural floor huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:17 PM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
distributed load vs. point load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:00 PM
cathedral ceiling rafter thrust load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:09 PM
ad load factor in asd huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:22 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:41 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多